Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alternative differential integrator.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alternative differential integrator.

    The differential integrator in MPP is based on a small signal model. It's is not a true differential integrator for larger signals.

    I'm submitting this alternative based on a Sample/Hold auto-zeroing configuration. The LF398 chip is inexpensive.

    The second sample (EF) is used to charge the S/H capacitor. The main sample is fed to one side of the S/H capacitor, thereby subtracting the "memorized" EF from the input signal (auto-zero). The output of the S/H is then fed on to a true integrator.

    This is the concept (node references corresponding to the MPP Rev. D schematic):






    J1 and U2 were chosen for convenience in LTSpice, but the original J113 and TL072 can be used just as well.
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Thanks Teleno, I guess this would help if I was to use the MPP with larger coil and 250-400uS TX pulse width?

    I applied the changes on my schematic, here it is.

    2092016.pdf

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by eclipse View Post
      Thanks Teleno, I guess this would help if I was to use the MPP with larger coil and 250-400uS TX pulse width?

      I applied the changes on my schematic, here it is.

      [ATTACH]37193[/ATTACH]
      To maintain the polarity of the output we would need an inverting amplifier, like the original MPP:



      Also, the capacitor C2 in my schematic should be 470nf (not 22nF).


      You can also use the audio circuit I had proposed before: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...172#post210172
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #4
        The audio section suggested I tested with the T3DX board and didn't work very well - sound was quite edgy.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by eclipse View Post
          The audio section suggested I tested with the T3DX board and didn't work very well - sound was quite edgy.
          Didn't test it myself. In any case using that audio circuit would allow you to remove the inverting amplifier U8b.

          Comment


          • #6
            Here's the updated version with the inverting op-amp. Attaching PDF file only because it's better than JPG, no preview sorry

            20092016_2.pdf

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by eclipse View Post
              Here's the updated version with the inverting op-amp. Attaching PDF file only because it's better than JPG, no preview sorry

              [ATTACH]37199[/ATTACH]
              It looks good. Now we only need to replace the timing logic by an ATtiny uC for flexibility. Q3 can be replaced by a 900V MOSFET, too.

              Comment


              • #8
                I've already done that with 2 different controllers PIC12F683 and PIC16F684. Audio needs to be made through the controller though, right now relies on the 555 audio.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by eclipse View Post
                  I've already done that with 2 different controllers PIC12F683 and PIC16F684. Audio needs to be made through the controller though, right now relies on the 555 audio.

                  Been trying to make a pic emulate a 555 audio VCO, but it is very difficult , but still trying, I would like to hear from anybody who has got the right code working.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Two more alternatives:


                    1. Switchable inverting-non-inverting voltage follower + integrator



                    2. inverting voltage follower + 2-path integrator.




                    LTSpice files attached as .zip
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What a variety Teleno!

                      Here's the full schematic with Option 1 with LF398 (not tested!).

                      20092016_3.pdf

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        One more version (since there was one op amp channel available) - the extra parts there suppose to give non-motion behavior.

                        Probably won't work but there it goes (taken from SuperScan/6PI)

                        20092016_04.pdf

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Will the first submitted proposal be compatible with the GB mod by Devor

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by eclipse View Post
                            Will the first submitted proposal be compatible with the GB mod by Devor
                            I wasn't aware of this mod, but if it is copatible with the original integrator then it should also be with my alternatives.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Good stuff, I'm sure these mods will be of great help!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X