Tweet
I am in stage of re-drawing your schematic in different software. So I want perfectly accurate schematic according to which I will draw my pcb.
And I want to pick best option. In your schematic you put all together, all the options. And it is confusing.
Why would I want to remove IC2? What are the pros&contras of that.
Is the coil same at both options? Single coil or coil with center tap?
At Tinkerer's schematic R1-4 are with values and at your schematic with zero values. If zero values then why those exist on schematic? Placeholders?
Also at Tinkerer's schematic there is significantly higher amplification than on your schematic; I guess it is due loss because of the R1-4 resitors.
We will agree that R1-4 will introduce more noise in signal path, so imho is better to omit them and use lower gain at opamps, as you did.
But than I should omit even the placeholders or not?
Can you (if not asking much) separate both options in two separate schematics and explain in short both options, pros and cons for each one.
This way is little bit confusing. I don't want both option on my pcb, I want clear one option and to avoid placeholders for componentes I will probably not use in option i picked.
I am sorry if I ask too much. But two separate option as schematic of RX will reduce any further confusion.
Things will evolve, hopefully more people will join, same questions will be asked all over again when topic grows to several tens of pages and more.
If you not sure about the component if you gonna use it or not; than it is better not to be present on pcb.
This reminds me on your first HH attempt, you put "dozen" options on one sch draw and one pcb draw. It was so confusing then. And my first two attempts to make it; failed so bad.
You must understant that I don't hide back in your head and I can not see your thoughts. Many of us do not.
Split your work on two separated and perfectly clear options and everything will be clearer and better to understand.
Your character seems to be like that; lazy on words, not only do you adore incomprehensible abbreviations in writing; you also like to put everything on one schematic and one pcb.
Like a pot with stew. Everything inside, so you guys pick what you want from it!
Imagine me, after a lot of effort to make it, after "100" new pages on the topic, a lot of effort (and money) in the end
it doesn't work for me, because I discover that I mixed up the options.
There are also people like me, who are stupid, not all of us are super smart to read other people's thoughts and immediately understand
everything "what the writer wanted to say"...
I sincerely apologize for these remarks, but it is better to say them now than much later.
And I want to pick best option. In your schematic you put all together, all the options. And it is confusing.
Why would I want to remove IC2? What are the pros&contras of that.
Is the coil same at both options? Single coil or coil with center tap?
At Tinkerer's schematic R1-4 are with values and at your schematic with zero values. If zero values then why those exist on schematic? Placeholders?
Also at Tinkerer's schematic there is significantly higher amplification than on your schematic; I guess it is due loss because of the R1-4 resitors.
We will agree that R1-4 will introduce more noise in signal path, so imho is better to omit them and use lower gain at opamps, as you did.
But than I should omit even the placeholders or not?
Can you (if not asking much) separate both options in two separate schematics and explain in short both options, pros and cons for each one.
This way is little bit confusing. I don't want both option on my pcb, I want clear one option and to avoid placeholders for componentes I will probably not use in option i picked.
I am sorry if I ask too much. But two separate option as schematic of RX will reduce any further confusion.
Things will evolve, hopefully more people will join, same questions will be asked all over again when topic grows to several tens of pages and more.
If you not sure about the component if you gonna use it or not; than it is better not to be present on pcb.
This reminds me on your first HH attempt, you put "dozen" options on one sch draw and one pcb draw. It was so confusing then. And my first two attempts to make it; failed so bad.
You must understant that I don't hide back in your head and I can not see your thoughts. Many of us do not.
Split your work on two separated and perfectly clear options and everything will be clearer and better to understand.
Your character seems to be like that; lazy on words, not only do you adore incomprehensible abbreviations in writing; you also like to put everything on one schematic and one pcb.
Like a pot with stew. Everything inside, so you guys pick what you want from it!
Imagine me, after a lot of effort to make it, after "100" new pages on the topic, a lot of effort (and money) in the end
it doesn't work for me, because I discover that I mixed up the options.
There are also people like me, who are stupid, not all of us are super smart to read other people's thoughts and immediately understand
everything "what the writer wanted to say"...
I sincerely apologize for these remarks, but it is better to say them now than much later.
Comment