If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Main Discussion
Very interesting, neat, likeable!
I am interested in one thing; why did you decide to generate the sine signal from the MCU directly?
In this way, you took even 8 pins!
Among them is a UART port as well as some very useful PWM pins.
Some are directly tied and controlled by timers.
Too many resources wasted. Hence the two Nanos.
I'm not saying it's bad, it can be done that way too, why not.
I'm just wondering why you didn't just use one PWM pin and still shape it with a discrete solution out of MCU.
Even more; wouldn't it be interesting to drive the TX directly with a square signal?
So much for now, I didn't get to analyze everything.
But you certainly gave a very good starting point for upgrades!
Great idea!
Very interesting, neat, likeable!
I am interested in one thing; why did you decide to generate the sine signal from the MCU directly?
In this way, you took even 8 pins!
Among them is a UART port as well as some very useful PWM pins.
Some are directly tied and controlled by timers.
Too many resources wasted. Hence the two Nanos.
I'm not saying it's bad, it can be done that way too, why not.
I'm just wondering why you didn't just use one PWM pin and still shape it with a discrete solution out of MCU.
Even more; wouldn't it be interesting to drive the TX directly with a square signal?
So much for now, I didn't get to analyze everything.
But you certainly gave a very good starting point for upgrades!
Great idea!
One of the ideas that comes to my mind is the use of a mux circuit in sine wave generation.
Of course, that part of the code will undergo major changes. With just 5 random pins you expand to 16 channels.
Comment