Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Main Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Main Discussion

    This is the main discussion area for the project.

    The introduction is here -> Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Published January 2024
    Last edited by Qiaozhi; 01-21-2024, 10:02 AM.

  • #2
    Excellent stuff George, my book is on order and eagerly awaited.

    Comment


    • #3
      Interesting.. We will follow the development of the project. Thank you!

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Qiaozhi,
        nice project... just purchased a copy of the book on Amazon....

        Comment


        • #5

          Comment


          • #6
            Very interesting, neat, likeable!
            I am interested in one thing; why did you decide to generate the sine signal from the MCU directly?
            In this way, you took even 8 pins!
            Among them is a UART port as well as some very useful PWM pins.
            Some are directly tied and controlled by timers.
            Too many resources wasted. Hence the two Nanos.
            I'm not saying it's bad, it can be done that way too, why not.
            I'm just wondering why you didn't just use one PWM pin and still shape it with a discrete solution out of MCU.
            Even more; wouldn't it be interesting to drive the TX directly with a square signal?
            So much for now, I didn't get to analyze everything.
            But you certainly gave a very good starting point for upgrades!
            Great idea!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ivconic View Post
              Very interesting, neat, likeable!
              I am interested in one thing; why did you decide to generate the sine signal from the MCU directly?
              In this way, you took even 8 pins!
              Among them is a UART port as well as some very useful PWM pins.
              Some are directly tied and controlled by timers.
              Too many resources wasted. Hence the two Nanos.
              I'm not saying it's bad, it can be done that way too, why not.
              I'm just wondering why you didn't just use one PWM pin and still shape it with a discrete solution out of MCU.
              Even more; wouldn't it be interesting to drive the TX directly with a square signal?
              So much for now, I didn't get to analyze everything.
              But you certainly gave a very good starting point for upgrades!
              Great idea!

              I actually discuss those points in the book.

              Comment


              • #8

                Comment


                • #9
                  Got my book this morning, very nice indeed.
                  I particularly like the flexibility achieved by using the R-2R DAC driver for the TX.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Olly View Post
                    Got my book this morning, very nice indeed.
                    I particularly like the flexibility achieved by using the R-2R DAC driver for the TX.
                    Thanks Olly.
                    Glad you like it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      One of the ideas that comes to my mind is the use of a mux circuit in sine wave generation.
                      Of course, that part of the code will undergo major changes.

                      With just 5 random pins you expand to 16 channels.



                      Comment


                      • #12
                        There is a little mistake on page 134. In the 10k listing the last resistor should be R70 (not R79).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by turboaleks View Post
                          There is a little mistake on page 134. In the 10k listing the last resistor should be R70 (not R79).
                          Thanks.
                          I've add that to the Errata section -> Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Published January 2024

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Also, 2 X LT1054 (U2 & U3) missing from IC s on p133

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Goaty View Post
                              Also, 2 X LT1054 (U2 & U3) missing from IC s on p133
                              Thanks ... added to errata list -> Arduino Nano VLF Metal Detector Project - Published January 2024​​
                              It doesn't matter how many times you read through the text, there's always some pesky errors that slip through.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X