Thanks for the sim. I'll study it!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BIPOLAR ALTERNATIVE TO H BRIDGE
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by moodz View PostThanks Mark ...
attached is the sim file to play with.
The TX frequency is 200 microseconds ( 5 Khz ) ... with 5 microsecond sampling at start and end of current pulse to measure "tilt or ramp error".
The target switches in and out at a 10 millisecond rate to test loop recovery.
With correct timing adjustment will support other TX frequencies.
moodz / Paul.
May be my copy of LTSPICE though as I've just updated it to 17.0.42 (mac) - what version are you using ?
Regards,
Olly
Comment
-
Originally posted by Olly View Post
Looks very interesting so thought I'd have a play with the sim file you posted but LTSPICE can't seem to find the symbol for V10 & V11. (VOLTAGE_DC)
May be my copy of LTSPICE though as I've just updated it to 17.0.42 (mac) - what version are you using ?
Regards,
Olly
Comment
-
-
This bridge works fine, BUT! , M3 and M4 ( #1 ) must be replaced with p-channel mosfets to enable the bridge to operate at higher supply voltages. moodz to tell how to throw away (but not exactly like)M1 and M2, because I'm uncomfortable - after all, the idea and the thread are his property
​
Comment
-
I just came across this. Can anyone confirm that the main advantage of this circuit is that it has a higher efficiency than a standard pulse generator in a PI detector? Or are there additional advantages? What implications does the bipolar pulse have on the electronics in the amplification chain? Has anyone developed a proper amplification circuit for the Rx pulse for this yet?
Comment
-
Yes, higher efficiency since it recycles flyback energy. Also faster as it requires no damping. Also bipolar which (a) eliminates the need for EFE samples and (b) improves EMI immunity. Also CCPI which allows for much faster pulse rates. This approach requires an IB coil which potentially makes the RX circuit a little easier. See the AMX project for an example design.
Comment
Comment