field test unit no 001 "model T"

[Aziz]

Ufox is trying to get more info about the "World's best ground balance technology" (WBGB).
*LOL*
Ufox never contributed to a serious discussion. Only abusing and discrediting. I'm one of the "bad guys" target late time.
Aziz

[UrbanFox]

"World's best ground balance technology" (WBGB).
Aziz

Aziz, You still haven't answered my previous question. Pray tell where you are getting the X component from and how you are going to use it with the waveforms seen in this thread so far considering the effect that varying coil distance from the ground is going to have when the x component is used to calculate GB. Don't just continue to sing your Doo Dar Doo Dar Day worlds best ground balance nursery rhyme.

[Aziz]

Aziz, You still haven't answered my previous question. Pray tell where you are getting the X component from and how you are going to use it with the waveforms seen in this thread so far considering the effect that varying coil distance from the ground is going to have when the x component is used to calculate GB. Don't just continue to sing your Doo Dar Doo Dar Day worlds best ground balance nursery rhyme.

Hey Ufox, what's the problem? You don't believe in my WBGB technolgy. It doesn't even exists in your world. So why are you insisting on to know about it?
Aziz

[UrbanFox]

Hey Ufox, what's the problem?

Aziz, I don't have a problem. The problem is not mine.

You don't believe in my WBGB technolgy. It doesn't even exists in your world. So why are you insisting on to know about it?
Aziz

Aziz, look for the downsides as well as what you perceive to be the upsides.

Aziz, I am not trying to be smart. If you are not prepared to give an explanation then can anyone here give me an explanation of how X and R are to be combined with a PI to cancel the ground.

[Davor]

Hi Davor, could you please explain for me ...

You mean in fluent trollish? L e t m e w r i t e s l o o o o w l y s o t h a t y o u c a n r e a d i t: y o u c o u l d n e i t h e r u n d e r s t a n d n o r s t o p n a g g i n g i n a m i l l i o n y e a r s, a n d I d o n' t s e e t h e p o i n t. N o w a s k y o u r l i t e r a t e t r o l l b u d d i e s t o t r a n s l a t e t h i s t o y o u.


For the rest of us, the definition of logical fallacy says: "It exploits emotional triggers in the listener or takes advantage of social relationships between people."
Rhetorical questions are one of the classic examples of fallacious arguments and meaningless questions are fallacious per se. Trolls like ufox are mere empty shells incapable of real social relationships, or any true contribution.

[Aziz]

Aziz, I am not trying to be smart. If you are not prepared to give an explanation then can anyone here give me an explanation of how X and R are to be combined with a PI to cancel the ground.

The only way to get the sophisticated knowledge & IP is (perhaps) to legally sue me. I want to be legally sued for knowing something, that you and other market leaders don't know. That's your chance. What's the problem? Sue me.
But do this before I give the technology to the Chinese...

[UrbanFox]

Rhetorical questions are one of the classic examples of fallacious arguments and meaningless questions are fallacious per se. Trolls like ufox are mere empty shells incapable of real social relationships, or any true contribution.

Rhetorical questions Davor.....I don't think so. Aziz suggested using the X and R component to cancel the ground in this thread which is discussing PI. In the VLF environment the X component is the change in amplitude caused by the ground and the R component is phase shift caused by the ground.

With PI things change. If we wait until the spike is out of the way there is no X component and there is no phase shift during the off period. Therefore, how do you use X and R to cancel the ground in the time domain.

I am interested to understand.

[Aziz]

Rhetorical questions Davor.....I don't think so. Aziz suggested using the X and R component to cancel the ground in this thread which is discussing PI. In the VLF environment the X component is the change in amplitude caused by the ground and the R component is phase shift caused by the ground.

With PI things change. If we wait until the spike is out of the way there is no X component and there is no phase shift during the off period. Therefore, how do you use X and R to cancel the ground in the time domain.

I am interested to understand.

Sorry Ufox, you have lost your credibility by discrediting honest and decent people. Don't expect anything.

[Davor]

So you do consult your troll buddies. Now this is a tad less trollish than before.

Now that you suddenly became eloquent as to rewording your "question" - just make an extra effort as to read the solution you are so desperate looking for by merely rewording your "question". Everything is already there. Including the elusive "how can I read two separate things that do not happen simultaneously"

Try reading this: X R

Any success?

[UrbanFox]

Try reading this: X R

Any success?

Would you like to tell me where your X R are to come from with respect to the spike with pulse induction?

[UrbanFox]

Sorry Ufox, you have lost your credibility by discrediting honest and decent people. Don't expect anything.

So Aziz, you don't have a clue, do you!!

[Davor]

Read woman!

there is no X component and there is no phase shift during the off period.

It is all in the coil. Seek and ye shall find.

[UrbanFox]

Read woman!It is all in the coil. Seek and ye shall find.

Are you up to explaining how you are going to make this PI GB work using X and R components taken from the TX spike?

[Aziz]

Are you up to explaining how you are going to make this PI GB work using X and R components taken from the TX spike?

Hey UFox,
what would you like to do: S = R+X
Detecting R in signal S (and remove X) or
detecting X in signal S and remove X to get R?
Why would you do which?

(Note, this is a test.)

[UrbanFox]

Hey UFox,
what would you like to do: S = R+X
Detecting R in signal S (and remove X) or
detecting X in signal S and remove X to get R?
Why would you do which?

(Note, this is a test.)

As we are only talking about ground balance then I assume you mean ground S (Signal)= ground R + X???


If so then, in the frequency domain, we mix ground X & R to achieve ground balance. In other words we subtract the amplitude from the phase shift to achieve a null but it isn't possible to achieve GB and discriminate using the same mix of X and R so we use another channel and filters to discriminate.


The time domain is different though, the phase shift in vlf now becomes magnetic viscosity and there is no X component if we sample after the spike so I ask you again how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

NOTE...how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

(Note, this is a test.) lol