Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

field test unit no 001 "model T"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by UrbanFox View Post
    Are you up to explaining ...
    Depends on a person. It obviously does not work on trolls
    You passed on a perfectly self-explanatory rhetorical question that obviously failed to unfold it's self-contained answer on you. See, you have no capacity to understand, so stop trying. That small area below hairdo may start hurting you.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Davor View Post
      Offers nothing of consequence...
      So you don't have a clue, and would like to divert attention away from this fact with waffle!!!

      Comment


      • even that one is a fallacy

        You troll litter really have no clue.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Davor View Post
          even that one is a fallacy

          You troll litter really have no clue.
          Keep romancing Davor. Wake me up when you realise what you have not got.

          Comment


          • Ive been following this thread when time permits and not commenting because its out my depth half the time, reading the threads is interesting because you clever engineers are thrashing out your knowledge and views to try and come to a decisive answer to mathmatical theorys in the formats of metal detecting here in the mid 2000 centrury.
            Do you think This forum should have really been called( Field test ) should have been called Back to the drawing board.
            If you were field testing you would have all built the project by now or at least part and doing proper field testing ie: out in the real world, so in my way of thinking lableing this thread field test was very much premature, However still very interesting and keep up the good work.
            Warm regards

            Comment


            • YES BRUCE.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by UrbanFox View Post
                As we are only talking about ground balance then I assume you mean ground S (Signal)= ground R + X???


                If so then, in the frequency domain, we mix ground X & R to achieve ground balance. In other words we subtract the amplitude from the phase shift to achieve a null but it isn't possible to achieve GB and discriminate using the same mix of X and R so we use another channel and filters to discriminate.


                The time domain is different though, the phase shift in vlf now becomes magnetic viscosity and there is no X component if we sample after the spike so I ask you again how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

                NOTE...how do you use X to cancel a magnetic viscosity signal that contains no X component?

                (Note, this is a test.) lol
                Hey UFox, why don't you give up? You and your friends don't deserve the WBGB technology.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Aziz View Post
                  (Note, this is a test.)

                  Originally posted by Aziz View Post
                  Hey UFox, why don't you give up? You and your friends don't deserve the WBGB technology.

                  So Aziz, you have no response to my answer to your test.


                  You appear to be saying with your R component that there is a phase shift where as there isn't any with a PI in the off period. (if you are seeing a phase shift in the off period, please show me this phase shift)


                  Guys like you and Davor are only belittling the science when you belittle others but offer no substantiation for your claims. Nobody on this forum has ever proposed a method to achieve GB in a pi design except the SD2000, GS4 and TDI until you, Aziz, made your claim re using X and R to solve the problem.


                  Davor, you have given your support to Aziz. Are you stating you know Aziz's method or are you just being disruptive?? Do you give credence to his statement that he combines X & R to achieve GB with PI?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by UrbanFox View Post
                    So Aziz, you have no response to my answer to your test.


                    You appear to be saying with your R component that there is a phase shift where as there isn't any with a PI in the off period. (if you are seeing a phase shift in the off period, please show me this phase shift)


                    Guys like you and Davor are only belittling the science when you belittle others but offer no substantiation for your claims. Nobody on this forum has ever proposed a method to achieve GB in a pi design except the SD2000, GS4 and TDI until you, Aziz, made your claim re using X and R to solve the problem.


                    Davor, you have given your support to Aziz. Are you stating you know Aziz's method or are you just being disruptive?? Do you give credence to his statement that he combines X & R to achieve GB with PI?
                    Why should I respond to your b.s.? You don't need to believe in my claims. Do your own GB.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Aziz View Post
                      Why should I respond to your b.s.? You don't need to believe in my claims. Do your own GB.
                      Aziz, ask the nurse if you can have your medication doubled at least for today.


                      Also, see if there is a detox programme for this WBGB disease and associated paranoia.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Aziz View Post
                        Why should I respond to your b.s.?
                        Hey Aziz...Davor... did I ever tell you blokes I have nearly perfected Nuclear Fussion. With two "D" cells (they have to be fully charged) and a couple of mols of heavy hydrogen I can not only power a city the size of New York for a month, I also put out gold as a waste product. (Well, it's not waste really, I sell this gold for drinking money)

                        I carry this process out in a converted washing machine in my laundry, and also use the waste energy to heat water for my daily clothes washing cycle. When I say nearly perfected, the trouble I am having at the moment is some days there is not enough excess energy available to heat the clothes washing water properly.

                        But, I am keeping this IP to myself because I don't believe you blokes will believe my claims. (and I don't want the patent trolls getting my IP)

                        Comment


                        • UF, for the most part Geotech is not full of braggarts and grandstanders, but people sharing information, trying out ideas, and looking to learn. If you'd like to join in this capacity, please feel free to do so. Otherwise I think your purpose has run its course, and folks would like to move on.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                            UF, for the most part Geotech is not full of braggarts and grandstanders
                            Yes Carl, I understand that most on Geotech are not grandstanders. It is just the one bloke, Aziz, who has been romancing with himself about having the worlds best Ground Balance since JC wore short pants. But, as you have seen, it appears he does not have anything in the sack to justify his stance. I will leave you blokes alone now. Thanks Carl.

                            Comment


                            • Isn't this a thread about Moodz detector, if that is the case WhyTF is it being over run with off topic rubbish ?

                              I'm personally starting to loose interest in this rubbish, also loosing interest with Geotech forum because of it.

                              Sorry Carl excuse the french.

                              Comment


                              • Every public forum suffers from troll infestation occasionally, but it will not make moodz' contribution any smaller. At least you know where the party is

                                Comment

                                Working...