Originally posted by Pete the Builder
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
field test unit no 001 "model T"
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by moodz View Post..
There is a certain satisfaction in knowing something that no-one else knows ( at least to my knowledge and research).
..
*LOL*
Clue: Some processes are reversible.
Aziz
Comment
-
Originally posted by moodz View PostThe maths for PIs including target reponses is hellish .... better to forget it ... I suspect it is incomplete. Clue ... if you want a top machine ...there is a schematic on the web ... search on QED .. there is some info here at Geotech but more elsewhere ( cant say exactly as there is kind of a civil war involved about it as well ... and I dont mean Intellectual Property related ... ). This design is as good as or better a performer as machines costing $7400 more.
doesn't it cost $6500 anymore?
Is that the Greed-factor or the Gold-tax? Or the Rip-off-factor?
Aziz
Comment
-
Excellent effort, but did you think of introducing ferrite core as your differential monocoil (bifilar) does not respond to ferrite as such - or put another way - how will it effect the total scenario put down till date, if introduced? - my point is toward pin-pointing and miniaturization/down-scaling... "lite" is what they call... but sure my call is towards hunting river sand - or more so towards the old timers - a rectangular monocoil for sluice sieves type hunting - I don't feel that an idea worth "instructables". Anyway your algo starts and ends with Tx pulse and a 50us window everything else is a function and some are variable some automatic as much as I can understand.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pete the Builder View Post]Anyway, thanks very much for taking the time to respond so fully. I've learned more from this forum in a day than I've gleaned in a week on my own. So kudos, dude!
I assume you've seen this while trawling through the various forums ->
www.geotech1.com/itmd
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6666 View PostHi Moodz
is your new invention based on ready made commercial coil ?
and do you still use a ferrite choke on the coil cable ?.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6666 View PostHi Moodz
thanks for that, what are you future intentions
how will we be able to obtain your invention once all the "paper work" is done ?
will it be sold as a ready built device ?
cheers
6666
If the patent goes OPI ( Open for Public Inspection ) then you will be easily see how it can be done as it is based on a method and principle. Needless to say there is no damping resistorAs for sale ... I will be in Europe and the US in March then on to China in April .. we will see what eventuates
... hint the fast damping of sensor inductances has much wider applications than the relatively "niche" detector market.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vbeeeks View PostWhat has frequency sweep (10KHz ..20Khz) on Tx pulse, to do with discrimination?
Regards.
Comment
-
...good news everybody .... I have thrown the discrete Earth Field filter out of the circuit and using a "tricksy" variation of the same technique that achieves fast damping and autoground balance the EF problem is now resolved .... field test results soon. This was the last hurdle on the front end .. the presence of the Earth Field filter caused some reduction in sensitivity.
Transmit coil voltage is now set at 6 volts with 1.6 amp peak current and pulse repitition of 5 Khz and 2.5 us damping on the excellent "Nuggetfinder" Coil. There are no target holes and no EMI issues.
Comment
Comment