field test unit no 001 "model T"

[Kev]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

I dare say the Aziz's simulations do not show actual use a a real coil in use. So the air gap would not show on the computer simulations. But I hope that someday Aziz will actually build a "real" coil and show how good it works on real ground.

[Aziz]

Aziz a question for you please.

Thank you for the coil comparison modelling you did.
I was wondering though if inductance leakage around the air spaces in the basket/spider weave was taken into account in your modelling?
I believe it could be a significant factor in field density at distance?

Cheers

Yes, it has been taken into account.

[Aziz]

I dare say the Aziz's simulations do not show actual use a a real coil in use. So the air gap would not show on the computer simulations. But I hope that someday Aziz will actually build a "real" coil and show how good it works on real ground.

Wrong again. Want some tar & feather?

[Aziz]

I agree.
Please, please give it a rest.

Everyone is tired of the same old rhetoric. You've all made your point, and now it's time to move on.
If you don't have something technically useful to add to the discussion, then please don't post. Silence is golden.

No please!
The forum-trolls have helped (motivated) to find the answers to the very interesting question.
As a result, we will have high performance & cheap PI coils soon (a ML beating coil).

Please add more fuel to the fire.
^sif

[sido]

No please!

As a result, we will have high performance & cheap PI coils soon (a ML beating coil).

Please add more fuel to the fire.
^sif

For all....Why does it ALWAYS have to be referred to a Minelab beating coil?

Aziz, I do respect you to some point from your past honest contributions (slowly fading though),
But dont you think recently you have totally gone off topic?

Everyone here is to learn, not to listen too how your life may be treating you.

Posting in the off topic section may be a better option for you as a suggestion if something not detector related is bothering you..

Not trying to have a go at you, just frustrated with the irrelevant comments which is making the Geotech experience very un-welcomed and un-pleasant.

Sid

[Aziz]

Please ignore Sid completely. Yet once again! (see #1077, #1078 )
He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Go on with adding more fuel to the fire.
I have still lot's of tar & feather.

^sif

[sido]

And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Go on with adding more fuel to the fire.

Please explain, this is what I mean....What fuel to the fire??

Aziz c'mon, Do what ever you are allowed too do so. If you are given the right to fuel some fire on the this forum....well let's just leave it at that.

Sid

[sido]

He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
And he isn't able to see the whole relevant picture.

Contribute to WHAT??.... I am reminding you that it has become un-pleasant....

What is the whole PICTURE?

Sid

[Aziz]

Please explain, this is what I mean....What fuel to the fire??

Aziz c'mon, Do what ever you are allowed too do so. If you are given the right to fuel some fire on the this forum....well let's just leave it at that.

Sid

Hey Sid,

no worries mate. It's only a nice teasing game of the forum-trolls. They just motivate us. As always.

BTW, if you want to see the outcome of the hot discussion, then go to the Doug's site.
All the calculated coil results were published there.
The outcome is really insane and will lead to new outperforming PI coils.
Cheers,
^sif

[sido]

[QUOTE=Aziz;190121]Please ignore Sid completely. Yet once again! (see #1077, #1078 )
He doesn't really contribute to this thread.
/QUOTE]

How can I....Dohhhh

Sid

[sido]

Hey Sid,

no worries mate. It's only a nice teasing game of the forum-trolls. They just motivate us. As always.

BTW, if you want to see the outcome of the hot discussion, then go to the Doug's site.
All the calculated coil results were published there.
The outcome is really insane and will lead to new outperforming PI coils.
Cheers,
^sif

I have no problems with relevant documented data..

The problem is I have never been accepted to be able to view it...

I have been accused of being a internet troll....I can tell you I am far from it.

Sid

[Aziz]

Coil Comparison Results..

Ok guys,

I'm uploading the calculated coil simulation results here too. If you need more info, go to Doug's forum.
Forum-trolls are strictly not allowed to download it.
CoilComp7(CoilCMP4)-05.zip
Cheers,
^sif

[sido]

Ok guys,

I'm uploading the calculated coil simulation results here too. If you need more info, go to Doug's forum.
Forum-trolls are strictly not allowed to download it.
[ATTACH]29748[/ATTACH]
Cheers,
^sif

Maybe we should all switch to the other forum mate??

What the Fan belt is going on here???

Sid

[sido]

I will just say this once and only.....

How can anyone contribute to anything that may be remotely related to MINELAB on the forum.......directly or in-directly.

That is what keeps me and I assume others from expressing their opinions.

It is no fun, unless it has been authorised by personnel to do so.

Sid