Seeker, I respect where you are coming from, but I think the whole point of this thread is to get the TH community together to build a working GPR. For example, I know a little about EE but my strong point is in Computer Science. I am willing to spend the time, which is a resource, putting together a computer GPR interface. Hopefully, if we get enough people together others can chip in or suggest corrections either to your GPR design or to the software.
By vaguely suggesting that others, who may not be experienced in EE, read through the thread and try to assemble the GPR, I think is counter productive. It would almost be like getting all the parts to a car and telling a non mechanically inclined person to assemble it with very limited instructions and knowledge.
Someone mentioned that they were knowledgable about antenna's, RF. If we all chip in and lay our cards on the table we can improve, and hone the design over time. At least that is my suggestion.
Otherwise, this noble project will fall to the wayside as others may not be knowledgable enough to assemble it, or inclined to pursue it if it seems the burden falls on a few people to accomplish the project.
By vaguely suggesting that others, who may not be experienced in EE, read through the thread and try to assemble the GPR, I think is counter productive. It would almost be like getting all the parts to a car and telling a non mechanically inclined person to assemble it with very limited instructions and knowledge.
Someone mentioned that they were knowledgable about antenna's, RF. If we all chip in and lay our cards on the table we can improve, and hone the design over time. At least that is my suggestion.
Otherwise, this noble project will fall to the wayside as others may not be knowledgable enough to assemble it, or inclined to pursue it if it seems the burden falls on a few people to accomplish the project.
Comment