Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mpp beach rev-e step 3 problem

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mpp beach rev-e step 3 problem

    Hi
    I have a problem at step 3 on rev-e build.
    "You can also see that the TX oscillator is synchronized to U9 (LT1054 voltage converter) by
    monitoring TP2 with an oscilloscope (channel 1), and U9 pin2 (channel 2)"
    See photo, TP2 is yellow, pin2 U9 is pink..Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190311_114201.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	500.0 KB
ID:	371008

  • #2
    Originally posted by Hrthomas View Post
    Hi
    I have a problem at step 3 on rev-e build.
    "You can also see that the TX oscillator is synchronized to U9 (LT1054 voltage converter) by
    monitoring TP2 with an oscilloscope (channel 1), and U9 pin2 (channel 2)"
    See photo, TP2 is yellow, pin2 U9 is pink..[ATTACH]45646[/ATTACH]
    The internal oscillator of the LT1054 runs at a nominal frequency of 25kHz, so you will need to change the timebase on your scope to zoom in and see the synchronization.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi, is this correct?Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190311_135011.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	558.8 KB
ID:	353542

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Hrthomas View Post
        Hi, is this correct?[ATTACH]45650[/ATTACH]
        Yes, that's correct. As it says in the Build Document:
        Since the TX oscillator pulse rate is considerably lower than the LT1054’s internal oscillator, it is not possible to synchronize the diode pump from this external signal. In this circuit the TX oscilator causes the diode pump’s internal oscillator to pause momentarily, and then restarts it so that both oscillators are in sync.

        Comment


        • #5
          Ok, thanks then i will move on to next step

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
            Yes, that's correct. As it says in the Build Document:
            Since the TX oscillator pulse rate is considerably lower than the LT1054?s internal oscillator, it is not possible to synchronize the diode pump from this external signal. In this circuit the TX oscilator causes the diode pump?s internal oscillator to pause momentarily, and then restarts it so that both oscillators are in sync.
            Hi,

            I have just reached step 3 and I note that my image varies somewhat from the one that Hrthomas posted above and I would like to check prior to moving on. Thanks.
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20200319_150414.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1,017.8 KB
ID:	356794

            Comment


            • #7
              MPP Beach Rev E Step#3

              Originally posted by surfdetector View Post
              Hi,

              I have just reached step 3 and I note that my image varies somewhat from the one that Hrthomas posted above and I would like to check prior to moving on. Thanks.
              [ATTACH]49714[/ATTACH]
              So as stated in my previous post I am on Step #3 of the MPP Beach Rev E and to quote from the build document..... You can also see that the TX oscillator is synchronized to U9 (LT1054 voltage converter) bymonitoring TP2 with an oscilloscope (channel 1), and U9 pin2 (channel 2).

              I have checked this many times and it appears that the waves forms only synchronize very rarely. I managed to get a picture before the wave form changed back to non-synch. Hopefully someone will be able to add some knowledgeable illumination on this for me and what might be the cause. I appreciate the help. Thanks.
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi surfdetector,

                I am replying here instead of PM. If I recall correctly, it is a "quasi synchronisation".
                I was asking similar questions hopefully not driving Qiaozhi nuts in the process.
                Can't find those posts ... dang.

                Important is this part during the sampling phase. Check it later if you like. It works. Don't worry about it and continue building.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Polymer View Post
                  Hi surfdetector,

                  I am replying here instead of PM. If I recall correctly, it is a "quasi synchronisation".
                  I was asking similar questions hopefully not driving Qiaozhi nuts in the process.
                  Can't find those posts ... dang.

                  Important is this part during the sampling phase. Check it later if you like. It works. Don't worry about it and continue building.
                  Hi Polymer,

                  Thanks for the advise. I have done a short video of the issue which you can view through the YouTube link. The issue I find is repeatable each time after powering down and turning back on again. You can see the synchronization begin to drop out at around the 40 second mark.

                  https://youtu.be/3YXwde_W-RY

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by surfdetector View Post
                    Hi Polymer,

                    Thanks for the advise. I have done a short video of the issue which you can view through the YouTube link. The issue I find is repeatable each time after powering down and turning back on again. You can see the synchronization begin to drop out at around the 40 second mark.

                    https://youtu.be/3YXwde_W-RY
                    Since neither the TX oscillator nor the LT1054's internal oscillator are crystal controlled, they are subject to temperature drift. However, as you can see from the video, the two remain "more or less" locked together, and the LT1054's oscillator is not free-running. You are (of course) free to experiment and find a better solution. Unlike the ICL7660A, the LT1054 is capable of operating with a much lower sync frequency, so you might be able to operate it directly from the TX oscillator. Personally, I haven't tried that. In fact, the original Minipulse design used a discrete voltage converter that was free-running, so the current implementation is a big improvement.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thank you for for taking the time to review my question. I am very much a neophyte but am learning .
                      Cheers

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        now home time I have taken pcb minipulse, mounting I was wrong connecting volatage to reverse, lt1054 does not work, can I replace it with 7660s ?? just to keep going

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by PITER View Post
                          now home time I have taken pcb minipulse, mounting I was wrong connecting volatage to reverse, lt1054 does not work, can I replace it with 7660s ?? just to keep going
                          You can, but remember that the 7660S (and 7660A) have an absolute voltage rating of 13V. Ideally you should not go above 12V.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X