We have discussed a charter for an open metal detector which became the Code of Conduct. While that is being finalised and ratified its time for the next step.
Its appropriate now to discuss what such a project would look like so that we can organise to achieve it.
Ideally a project would have the following features:
1) An overarching specification
Defining the physical characteristics and scope. What might be the variants for different conditions- eg an underwater detector
2) Modular Hardware and Software with subcomponents
Like the coil front end processing, DSP board, communications module, audio module and specify their interconnects
3) Possibly subcircuits within boards and the definition of those and their interconnects
4) The hardware should all be readily available hopefully worldwide.
5) Standardisaton of engineering tools and formats that are 'free'. eg LTSPice and Eagle come to mind
It should be designed to fit into a standard box, wand and different coils with parts to be readily available. Why? Because bench designs are not good enough and detector R&D needs to go the field to develop an excellent design. We don't want to waste time redoing the work that is in common for all projects and make sure that we allow people to focus on improving the subcircuits rather than making a new detector every time.
It should include as many types of detector as possible including PI, VLF etc
This thread is opened to begin discussion of how this could be done.
How it could be technically organised and architected?
What should the subcomponents of such a detector be?
Lets start from the top down and then go from the bottom up.
Chudster
Its appropriate now to discuss what such a project would look like so that we can organise to achieve it.
Ideally a project would have the following features:
1) An overarching specification
Defining the physical characteristics and scope. What might be the variants for different conditions- eg an underwater detector
2) Modular Hardware and Software with subcomponents
Like the coil front end processing, DSP board, communications module, audio module and specify their interconnects
3) Possibly subcircuits within boards and the definition of those and their interconnects
4) The hardware should all be readily available hopefully worldwide.
5) Standardisaton of engineering tools and formats that are 'free'. eg LTSPice and Eagle come to mind
It should be designed to fit into a standard box, wand and different coils with parts to be readily available. Why? Because bench designs are not good enough and detector R&D needs to go the field to develop an excellent design. We don't want to waste time redoing the work that is in common for all projects and make sure that we allow people to focus on improving the subcircuits rather than making a new detector every time.
It should include as many types of detector as possible including PI, VLF etc
This thread is opened to begin discussion of how this could be done.
How it could be technically organised and architected?
What should the subcomponents of such a detector be?
Lets start from the top down and then go from the bottom up.
Chudster
Comment