Originally posted by 6666
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Preamp
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by green View PostMy thoughts on signal to noise, hope some are close to correct. First, need to compare peak to peak not RMS. Sweep coil over target and miss the next sweep. Have a pulse .1 to.2 seconds long. RMS is going to approach zero. Peak to peak white noise typically 6 times RMS. When does the target signal disappear. Searched minimum signal to noise, 3 to 1 was a suggested value. Example: scales, lsd 1 gram, noise 0 to 5 grams. Add 5 grams, displays 5 to 10 grams. If the weight was added and removed when the no weight reading was 0 the reading would be in the noise band. Signal needs to be greater than noise to have signal reading greater than noise reading every time. 3mv noise doesn't tell me what I need to know. Eric was probably referencing a test point on a particular detector which would if I could calculate the gain. Noise and signal should be referenced to the input(coil volts). I'm thinking if I could detect a 1 uvolt change in coil volts that would be good. Did another schematic for a 1 and 10 uvolt test signal. Reply #67 didn't work, missed the obvious reason why. Appreciate comment if I missed something this time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by green View PostTried the circuit. This one worked. Looks like the 3Hz integrator filter is to low. Need to work on the amplifier noise. New schematic(gain jumper wrong on 4538 noise test_2)Attached Files
Comment
-
Preamp and noise
Originally posted by Teleno View PostMainly from this:
The higher the resistance, the higher the noise (increase follows a root square law)
[ATTACH]34790[/ATTACH]
About the noise, does anybody tries to make some changes in the main oscillator? like using a Xtal with divider (hef4060, etc ) , instead of RC and 555 ?
It seems to me , that an RC oscillator, because its is a free oscillator, runs with a lots of jitter. Sample after sample, the timing of sampling may vary, and the sample will sometimes be a bit later or a bit earlier then the previous one. (considering that the operator moving if very slow compared to the repeat period )
So, this will make and amplitude variation of the same target signal. Making an indesirable noise. May be I'm wrong.
The test can be done on one kind of pulse, just for testing. I will do it as soon as I have a real PI running. For the moment i only do some tries on Spice.
Also this is the preamp thread, I have do some spice runs with a THS4031 OPA, (just a bit expensive about $4) instead of classic NE5534, and with schottky diodes instead of 1n4148, it makes the sampling possible more sooner , and 6 to 8 µs seems to be possible , after the beginning of the flyback impulse.
I will post them , as soon as I can post pictures.
(It is my first post, so I will try to explain later my points of interest in this very good forum. )
Comment
Comment