Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IB-PI DISCRIMINATING PICTURES

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IB-PI DISCRIMINATING PICTURES

    I am showing here one method of discriminating FE.

    picture # 1 shows no target
    # 2 shows the response of a lead Minie ball
    #3 shows the response of the steel lug of somewhat similar size.

    Note how the signal goes negative on the left side as well as on the right side for the lead target, and how it goes positive on the left side and negative on the right side for the FE target.

    What will happen if we feed a sample from each side into a summing amplifier?

    Tinkerer
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Tinkerer, I'm assuming the left side is "on" and the right side is "off"?

    Comment


    • #3
      Tinkerer whats with the oscillations at the start of the transmit ?

      Zed

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by hobbes_lives View Post
        Tinkerer, I'm assuming the left side is "on" and the right side is "off"?
        Right

        Tinkerer

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ZED View Post
          Tinkerer whats with the oscillations at the start of the transmit ?

          Zed
          Loose cable, I dropped a cannon ball on the coil.

          Tinkerer

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tinkerer View Post
            Loose cable, I dropped a cannon ball on the coil.

            Tinkerer
            Ouch !!!

            Zed

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tinkerer View Post
              I am showing here one method of discriminating FE.
              What will happen if we feed a sample from each side into a summing amplifier?
              Tinkerer
              Hi Tinkerer,

              That's an interesting idea, for the lead (and hopefully for other non-ferrous metals) the signal will add up while for iron, it will decrease, unfortunately the target may not remain "invisible". I think for the example you provided, it may be better to disregard the second part of the signal alltogether.
              Maybe the left signal and right signal could be used together for corellation (if both are slightly negative, it is a stronger hint of a non-ferrous target).

              Regards,
              Nicolae

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by nick_f View Post
                Hi Tinkerer,

                That's an interesting idea, for the lead (and hopefully for other non-ferrous metals) the signal will add up while for iron, it will decrease, unfortunately the target may not remain "invisible". I think for the example you provided, it may be better to disregard the second part of the signal alltogether.
                Maybe the left signal and right signal could be used together for corellation (if both are slightly negative, it is a stronger hint of a non-ferrous target).

                Regards,
                Nicolae
                Hi Nicolae,

                This picture is from a while back. The discrimination on these thick targets is easy. However, with thin rusty steel sheet targets, the discrimination is more difficult.

                By using separate samples for short TC targets, and long TC targets, separate for FE and gold, the differentiation is much better.

                I suggest you build the last version of the TINKERERS_V1. You will be surprised by it's discriminating capability and sensitivity.

                Tinkerer

                Comment

                Working...
                X