It has been predicted, that the year 2012 will be a year of great advances in metal detector technology.
For some time now, it seemed that the PI as well as the VLF technology has reached a dead end. Everything has been tried and developed as far as it can go.
So what, we add a few bells and whistles and a new detector hit’s the market.
Is this the way it is?
Is there really nothing left to improve in detector technology?
As a tinkerer, I see it different. There are so many ways that detectors can be improved and I am sure that the common brain of the forum can come up with many excellent ideas.
Many of the ideas of course have been around for many years, but different priorities, or less perfect components made their use difficult.
I would like to start the new year exploring some ideas for real improvement of detector technology.
Starting with the Pulse Induction method:
Can we improve the detection depth?
More TX power gives more depth.
How can we improve TX power?
What are the pitfalls?
We have excellent light weight batteries available that make it possible to increase the power without increasing the weight beyond an acceptable limit.
We could also look at recycling some of the TX power.
Yes, it has been tried before. Can we really improve on that?
I say YES WE CAN.
I would like to see some new ideas presented here. OK, yes I have many ideas of my own, but I am sure that the common brain of the forum has many more ideas and probably even better ones than I have.
For the skeptics there is place too. I like to look at everything from every angle, therefore I appreciate if somebody comes up and shows me an angle that I have missed.
Tinkerer
For some time now, it seemed that the PI as well as the VLF technology has reached a dead end. Everything has been tried and developed as far as it can go.
So what, we add a few bells and whistles and a new detector hit’s the market.
Is this the way it is?
Is there really nothing left to improve in detector technology?
As a tinkerer, I see it different. There are so many ways that detectors can be improved and I am sure that the common brain of the forum can come up with many excellent ideas.
Many of the ideas of course have been around for many years, but different priorities, or less perfect components made their use difficult.
I would like to start the new year exploring some ideas for real improvement of detector technology.
Starting with the Pulse Induction method:
Can we improve the detection depth?
More TX power gives more depth.
How can we improve TX power?
What are the pitfalls?
We have excellent light weight batteries available that make it possible to increase the power without increasing the weight beyond an acceptable limit.
We could also look at recycling some of the TX power.
Yes, it has been tried before. Can we really improve on that?
I say YES WE CAN.
I would like to see some new ideas presented here. OK, yes I have many ideas of my own, but I am sure that the common brain of the forum has many more ideas and probably even better ones than I have.
For the skeptics there is place too. I like to look at everything from every angle, therefore I appreciate if somebody comes up and shows me an angle that I have missed.
Tinkerer
Comment