If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's made a PC-base metal detector with usb interface !!!
Ya wanna have more anti-interference IB coil ideas (or inventions)?
Stay tuned ...
Aziz
Ok, eat this:
#1 (main course, yummy, yummy):
Just exchange the coil position of RX+ and RX-/TX-Bucking coil bundle in the "top hat" coil design showed in post #1366 (http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...postcount=1366) and invert the winding orientation of the TX-Bucking coil so it opposes the TX coil winding orientation. This is a typical modified standard concentric co-planar IB coil with the anti RX coil placed above the coil embodiment. Fine balance with distance variation of anti RX coil.
That's an "old hat" idea and not a "top hat". Hey, but it's looking like a "top hat" coil again.
Anyway, it improves the standard concentric co-planar IB coil due to the fact, that the bucking coil turns count gets slightly lesser (not much, a tad). Full anti-interference feature due to identical RX+/RX- coils. This coil is easy to build and balance as well.
Modifying an existing concentric co-planar IB-coil doesn't make sense as the bucking coil therein needs a tad less turns count. But you could put an extra turn (or two) of TX coil outside the coil embodiment edge and could try the modification.
#2 (dessert):
Standard concentric co-planar IB coil with the anti RX coil placed apart from the IB coil (50 cm or less, or even more distance) but at the same vertical planar position (parallel to IB coil). That's an old idea. I have published it already somewhere.
Cheers,
Aziz
PS: Patent trolls, keep out please. You may use it too but you aren't allowed to patent it. Thank you very much.
I'll try a different pre-amplifier front-end: the voltage controlled amplifier (VCA) .
I do have a very low noise discrete VCA solution and want to try it. The controlling voltage is fed from the other sound card ouput line (instead of input compensation). Let's see how this works. Unfortunately, it doesn't fit into the PCB space. It requires more parts of course. This is just for my own curiosity.
Now im learning 55 pages from this thread and looks interesting.
If you are planning to sell some finished kit, then count on me.
I will buy one or more.
Sorry tjmlena,
I do not intend to sell anything.
This thread/project is for
- sharing experience
- education (if you find something valuable)
- entertainment
- stimulating ideas
- bashing and blaming patent trolls http://devhumor.com/patent-chart/
Great link. I share the same views about patents, and for many years so far. The idea is not new, and interesting about it is that the most creative people of all tend to embrace it more often than not. Say, Don Lancaster http://tinaja.com/ - there is a whole patent avoidance library with down to earth explanation of the process, and all the rotten places to avoid.
this is the voltage controlled amplifier (VCA) I want to try out soon (see below). Notice, it is a small signal high gain VCA. A second amplifier stage is added and is sent to the right channel.
The controlling voltage is fed from the right line output channel of the sound card. Well, it is an AC controll voltage so I want to use the AC input. Note, positive control voltage disables the VCA (no collector current flowing) und is good for masking out unwanted signals.
Who wants to have the LTSpice-file to play with?
Cheers,
Aziz
BTW, since you played with a true discrete differential amp, here acting as VCA, it is a sacrilege wasting a perfectly good symmetrical input for ground connection.
There is a VCA solution with FET optocoupler that is supposed to work nice, and there are solutions with OTA. OK, your solution here is not unlike OTA, and is probably much better regarding noise. Then again - what noise? I'd go for OTA.
BTW, since you played with a true discrete differential amp, here acting as VCA, it is a sacrilege wasting a perfectly good symmetrical input for ground connection.
There is a VCA solution with FET optocoupler that is supposed to work nice, and there are solutions with OTA. OK, your solution here is not unlike OTA, and is probably much better regarding noise. Then again - what noise? I'd go for OTA.
True, but...
the other solutions can't beat it in regards to noise, stability, accuracy, BW, AC capability... And you can use here simple matched transistor pairs too.
The VCA can achieve 1.2 nV/sqrt(Hz) input referred noise density in the configuration above.
I'm open for further suggestions. Any better solutions there?
Aziz
Scroll down to an "analog multiplier..." part and enjoy. It is not yet THE thing that you asked for but has a potential to become one. It can also be made with discrete components, and it is incredibly fast.
I think this can become a platform for applying various weighting functions against PI signals and see what comes out of it.
Comment