First I want to apologize for my ignorance on coils and coil shielding but lately I have been doing a lot of field tests on salty beaches with my PICKINI detector and found out empirically what is probably already explained and documented somewhere on this nice forum:
1. Unshielded flat spiral coil ID 14cm OD 24cm - 30 turns:

Forget about the alu tape, this version is completely unshielded and potted in 2 component resin.
It performed well on dry sand, but a lot less on the wet beach.
Whenever the head touched dune grass or the sand, it gave false signals.
2. Unshielded round coil diameter 20 cm - 27 turns:
Same environment, but no false signals when touching ground or grass.
I assume electrostatic charging of the coil head is much worse with the flat spiral as it has a much larger surface than the siimple round coil.
If static charging / discharging is what causes the false signals, how can this be resolved by connecting a shield to the signal ground of the detector ? I would assume that the electrostatic charge is with respect to the real ground potential, the beach sand. Should there be a real ground potential lead dangling from the detector over the ground ??
With a shielded coil, none of the previously mentioned problems occurred.
Forgive me if this sounds like a dumb question, but can somebody explain to me how a shield connected to a virtual ground can reduce the static potential on the coil surface with respect to the real ground?
Regards,
- Bernard
1. Unshielded flat spiral coil ID 14cm OD 24cm - 30 turns:
Forget about the alu tape, this version is completely unshielded and potted in 2 component resin.
It performed well on dry sand, but a lot less on the wet beach.
Whenever the head touched dune grass or the sand, it gave false signals.
2. Unshielded round coil diameter 20 cm - 27 turns:
Same environment, but no false signals when touching ground or grass.
I assume electrostatic charging of the coil head is much worse with the flat spiral as it has a much larger surface than the siimple round coil.
If static charging / discharging is what causes the false signals, how can this be resolved by connecting a shield to the signal ground of the detector ? I would assume that the electrostatic charge is with respect to the real ground potential, the beach sand. Should there be a real ground potential lead dangling from the detector over the ground ??
With a shielded coil, none of the previously mentioned problems occurred.
Forgive me if this sounds like a dumb question, but can somebody explain to me how a shield connected to a virtual ground can reduce the static potential on the coil surface with respect to the real ground?
Regards,
- Bernard
Comment