Originally posted by xlev
View Post
To quote Reg
Hi All,
One of the question often asked is about the inductance of the receive and transmit coils. For simplicity, one can make the transmit coil 300 uh and the receive coil 450 uh. This works very well.
I have made both the transmit and the receive coils the same inductance and the coil worked well also. At that time, I was making both coils 300 uh. However, by making the receive coil 450 uh, one gains a little on sensitivity. It isn't much but every bit helps.
One can vary the transmit and receive inductance a lot and make the PI work well. The main difference will be the minimal delay that you will be able to obtain. The larger the transmit and receive inductance, the longer the delay before sampling will be needed.
A DD design separates the transmit from the receive which makes it easier to get faster or shorter sampling times, so you can get shorter delays with a DD than with a mono with the same inductance. This is one of the advantages of the DD. Also, the ground signal is less on a DD, so there is less ground signal at shorter delays.
As for winding and aligning a DD coil for a PI, just use decent winding techniques for each set of coils. Alignment can be done to minimize the signal out of the receive winding by injecting a signal into the transmit winding and looking at the receive winding with a scope. Adjust the overlap such that there is a minimal of signal out of the receive.
If no scope is available, then one can simply overlap the two with about 1" or more of overlap and try it. Be careful of polarity. Always use a non-ferrous target and set the polarity for a positive signal when the object is passed over the overlap zone. A nickel makes a good target. the polarity of the receive winding has to be correct. Get it wrong and the audio will decrease on a target instead of increasing. Use a non ferrous conductor target when checking.
One of the question often asked is about the inductance of the receive and transmit coils. For simplicity, one can make the transmit coil 300 uh and the receive coil 450 uh. This works very well.
I have made both the transmit and the receive coils the same inductance and the coil worked well also. At that time, I was making both coils 300 uh. However, by making the receive coil 450 uh, one gains a little on sensitivity. It isn't much but every bit helps.
One can vary the transmit and receive inductance a lot and make the PI work well. The main difference will be the minimal delay that you will be able to obtain. The larger the transmit and receive inductance, the longer the delay before sampling will be needed.
A DD design separates the transmit from the receive which makes it easier to get faster or shorter sampling times, so you can get shorter delays with a DD than with a mono with the same inductance. This is one of the advantages of the DD. Also, the ground signal is less on a DD, so there is less ground signal at shorter delays.
As for winding and aligning a DD coil for a PI, just use decent winding techniques for each set of coils. Alignment can be done to minimize the signal out of the receive winding by injecting a signal into the transmit winding and looking at the receive winding with a scope. Adjust the overlap such that there is a minimal of signal out of the receive.
If no scope is available, then one can simply overlap the two with about 1" or more of overlap and try it. Be careful of polarity. Always use a non-ferrous target and set the polarity for a positive signal when the object is passed over the overlap zone. A nickel makes a good target. the polarity of the receive winding has to be correct. Get it wrong and the audio will decrease on a target instead of increasing. Use a non ferrous conductor target when checking.
Comment