Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

why

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Where to start....
    * All this talk about Q factors is related to TX oscillators, not RX circuits, so don't concern yourself with Q of RX coils.
    * Your Deus is not like other single-freq machines, so don't expect Q factors to be 'normal' at any of the operating frequencies. This Q concern is also irrelevant to Minelab BBS/FBS, Fisher CZ's, White's DFX/ VX3 / V3 and any other forced TX drive machines.
    *That LCR calculator appears to be mathematically thorough. Yes, put capacitor resistance= Zero, I guess it's less than 0.5 Ohms in reality.
    *Resonant frequency isn't just determined by L and C, if you have damping (Resistance) then the res freq drops. That calculator should show it, if you play around with some numbers. Try Q=100, then drop it to 15, then to 5 and you'll see.
    *Have a look in an electronics textbook, or online for detailed explanations of the workings of damped harmonic circuits, forced resonance etc.

    Comment


    • #47
      Thanks again.. That explains a lot.

      Comment


      • #48
        I dint know much about the ins and outs of this,,

        Gut feel is,

        if Rx coil is narrow band ( hi Q ) then it its phase centre is liable to shift about more.




        if Rx coil is broadband ( lo Q ) then its phase response is less likely to hop about causing trouble.

        The down side is a large R value will add noise to the preamp. S

        Comment


        • #49
          Yeah like many things in life... One step forward and two step backward.

          Comment


          • #50
            with some aussie designs, the Tx freq jumps around to say, 3 different ones. The Coils on those are not resonant.

            Anyone tried this approach for an experiment?

            IE multiple Tx freqs, No resonance and I presume no Rx resonance either? Dont want to copy anything or infringe.

            But broadband stuff is good at eradicating noise - in that you can extract signals from below the noise floor in other systems like CDMA for example.

            S

            Comment


            • #51
              I beleive that we may miss a trick with the way our coil bundles are made.


              In a radio or a power environment you would never bundle turns. I think the best performance is when turns sit side by side and in neat layered structure.

              I dont have an explanation for why this is better,I can recall lecturer talking about it being better but no detail.


              I want to make a Tx RX coil pair , bundled one Versus a Neat one and see if one 'Picks up" better than the other with a consistant Target pass on a Jig of some sort.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	65.1 KB
ID:	340767

              Comment


              • #52
                I made a picture. My guess is that Fig.1 will be the best, less turbulens ! But properly not much different.
                A good Winding machine with torque will allso be a needed tool, to make a good coil.
                Henrik.
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #53
                  I would think fig 2

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Henrikras View Post
                    I made a picture. My guess is that Fig.1 will be the best, less turbulens ! But properly not much different.
                    A good Winding machine with torque will allso be a needed tool, to make a good coil.
                    Henrik.
                    Could not tell you which is best but

                    Seen some YouTube videos of coils being wound both Garrett and Tesoro use Fig2

                    Also seen a cross section of a SEF that was a Fig 2 also

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      If you are machine-winding, and using self-bond wire, then you really HAVE to make the windings square or rectangular in cross-section, with hexagonal close-packed layering (like a bees honeycomb).
                      I think for home-built coils, rigidity is important. Coils need to be tightly bound, and preferably varnished / lacquered / resin-impregnated etc. I don't think for a DD coil the shape profile (round / square / rectangular) is important. But for a concentric, a square / rectangular RX coil with the TX bucking coil wound directly over it is a good thing, as it allows the touching windings to both be 'cold', minimising capacitive coupling between TX and RX.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Maybee some usefull in this... http://info.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Workshop...air_coils.html
                        My english is not good enough to understand everything.. Yes FIG 2 that must be the best.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Maximum inductance for a given length of wire requires a square cross-section. This is the construction assumed by Brook's equation, which is used in the coil calculator at the top of the Coils Forum.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            some good information on coil building here

                            Things like " Painting a shield on an irregular surface can cause excessive noise in the detector " I have not seen before and polypropylene vs. polyester although it concludes there is no performance difference

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X