Originally posted by 6666
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Litz wire size for coils
Collapse
X
-
Charted all of the coils I have made for the test. The target TC was 5.4usec instead of 5usec today, don't know why. Next test, chart signal amplitude vs target distance for the coils as is. Then shield some of them and with a longer lead line chart signal amplitude vs target distance. Targets, 1x1 inch aluminum can and something smaller. Maybe the smaller target will show a need for Litz wire. Maybe there is another test procedure that would show a need for litz wire. So far I'm not seeing it. Suggestions appreciated. Current profile, constant rate, 160usec on time, 1 amp peak.Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by green View PostCharted all of the coils I have made for the test. The target TC was 5.4usec instead of 5usec today, don't know why. Next test, chart signal amplitude vs target distance for the coils as is. Then shield some of them and with a longer lead line chart signal amplitude vs target distance. Targets, 1x1 inch aluminum can and something smaller. Maybe the smaller target will show a need for Litz wire. Maybe there is another test procedure that would show a need for litz wire. So far I'm not seeing it. Suggestions appreciated. Current profile, constant rate, 160usec on time, 1 amp peak.
You ask about the usefullnes of litz, I've seen Eric mention that one of the times litz has shown its advantages is with "invisible" gold nuggets
Here is a quote by somebody from 2004, talking about invisible nuggets and the problems of detecting them at that time.
There are still nuggets that hide in the ground mineral signal exclusion system of the Minelabs, and are now referred to as invisible nuggets. Some though, are even invisible without the surrounding ground matrix, and in this case, it appears that their invisibility is more the result of accretionary and precipitative processes involved in the nuggets formation, as opposed to holes in the detection system through which these gleamers continue to elude the Minelab PI user.
Comment
-
Originally posted by green View PostCharted all of the coils I have made for the test. The target TC was 5.4usec instead of 5usec today, don't know why. Next test, chart signal amplitude vs target distance for the coils as is. Then shield some of them and with a longer lead line chart signal amplitude vs target distance. Targets, 1x1 inch aluminum can and something smaller. Maybe the smaller target will show a need for Litz wire. Maybe there is another test procedure that would show a need for litz wire. So far I'm not seeing it. Suggestions appreciated. Current profile, constant rate, 160usec on time, 1 amp peak.Attached Files
Comment
-
Hi Green
I like your test results. What causes the separation between coil D and coil E start times in your chart? What kind of shielding do you plan to use?
Have a great day,
ChetAttached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chet View PostHi Green
I like your test results. What causes the separation between coil D and coil E start times in your chart? What kind of shielding do you plan to use?
Have a great day,
Chet
Comment
-
Originally posted by green View Post200 to 600 ohms is typical, I'll post what I get this time with the other information. My can says EZ-SLIDE. I use the brush on. Haven't tried the spray.
Thanks, I had a look at the factory website, there appears to be several different products, one they call "paint" and something else
and they have different ratio's 20:80 ~ ~ 80:20 I assume thats the amount of graphite in the mix
do you know which one you have ? wish we had this in Australia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6666 View PostThanks, I had a look at the factory website, there appears to be several different products, one they call "paint" and something else
and they have different ratio's 20:80 ~ ~ 80:20 I assume thats the amount of graphite in the mix
do you know which one you have ? wish we had this in Australia.
Comment
-
Charted some data with shielded coils. Made two rings to sandwich the coil between. Ring, 175IDx275mmOD. Easily covers coil. Got about 800 ohms/inch for the shield. Moving hand near coil not shielded caused a signal change about the same as the nugget at 2 inches. No change shielded. Had to change the lead wire from 12 inches twisted pair Teflon coated to 36 inches twisted pair pvc coated to get the resonance down to 1MHz for the test. Same results as the tests I've done in the past, shielding didn't effect signal strength. Don't think could sample any sooner with Litz wire compared to the other wires with the resonance down around 1MHz. Reply#95 covers what might be the benefit of using Litz. The picture says glue painted side to poster board, the poster board is painted so glue painted side to craft foam.Attached Files
Comment
Comment