Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Challenge Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Challenge Question

    Hi dear friends
    In Metal Detector Coil
    Low and high Henry and Ohm levels
    How does each change in function?
    Does it affect depth or distance?
    Are there any different types of metals in Sense?
    What is the best resistance and capacitance of coils in a pulse metal detector?
    Thanks & Regards

  • #2
    Not all the answers but somwhere for you to start
    http://chemelec.com/Projects/Metal-1...I-Detector.htm

    https://www.minelab.com/__files/f/11...S_&_THEORY.pdf

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks 6666, good articles, all basic information collected in one place.

      Now i have my question too)
      Is anywhere here handy formula for approximate calculation of signal attenuation with relation to coil diameter (mono coil), target distance and target diameter
      I just want to understand a little bit this process, i exactly know what signal, at first integrator output, decaying not by linear law.

      Regards.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by reza vir View Post
        Hi dear friends
        In Metal Detector Coil
        Low and high Henry and Ohm levels
        How does each change in function?
        Does it affect depth or distance?
        Are there any different types of metals in Sense?
        What is the best resistance and capacitance of coils in a pulse metal detector?
        Thanks & Regards
        This is a challenge to write a book. There are no easy answers, it is all a matter of trade-offs.

        For a given power supply, a lower L produces a stronger TX magnetic field.
        But on the RX side, a lower L creates a weaker RX signal.
        A lower R wastes less energy.
        But a higher R can produce flat-topping which can increase sensitivity.
        And so on...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Vadim18 View Post
          Thanks 6666, good articles, all basic information collected in one place.

          Now i have my question too)
          Is anywhere here handy formula for approximate calculation of signal attenuation with relation to coil diameter (mono coil), target distance and target diameter
          I just want to understand a little bit this process, i exactly know what signal, at first integrator output, decaying not by linear law.

          Regards.
          Cannot help with that one, however Eric did publish a graph, which requires carefull study to understand it, but its sort of in the realm of describing something close to what you are asking

          Comment


          • #6
            https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...908#post241908

            A chart that compares detection distance vs coil diameter using the same target. Targets move the curves up and down depending on size, slope stays the same. Assumes noise stays the same, I get noise proportional to coil diameter if inductance stays the same.

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks again 6666 and green, i still remember that chart, will try to learn.

              I think what if measure maximum distance to target not by santimeters, inches, etc. but by relation to coil diameter, say distance 3coil diameters, 2coil diameters, 0.5coil diameters, if take care for coil and target proportion. Is it will be more practical? I may be wrong).

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Vadim18 View Post
                Thanks again 6666 and green, i still remember that chart, will try to learn.

                I think what if measure maximum distance to target not by santimeters, inches, etc. but by relation to coil diameter, say distance 3coil diameters, 2coil diameters, 0.5coil diameters, if take care for coil and target proportion. Is it will be more practical? I may be wrong).
                The coil diameters increase by 1.5 with the chart.

                Wasn't thinking. You are suggesting X axis should be coil diameter maybe 3 diameters full scale? Have to think about that.
                Last edited by green; 03-02-2020, 05:01 PM. Reason: added sentence

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by green View Post
                  The coil diameters increase by 1.5 with the chart.

                  Wasn't thinking. You are suggesting X axis should be coil diameter maybe 3 diameters full scale? Have to think about that.
                  Think same data charted vs coil diameter
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by green View Post
                    Think same data charted vs coil diameter
                    Thank green, i just thought like a beginner. Now i have doubts i feel i need to study the theory.

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      I think will help, not to fast but at least will help to understand better. Thank you Qiaozhi.

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        [QUOTE = 6666; 266786] Не все ответы, но где-то для вас, чтобы начать
                        http://chemelec.com/Projects/Metal-1a/Understanding-the-PI-Detector.htm

                        https://www.minelab.com/ __files / f / 11043 / KBA_METAL_DETECTOR_BASICS _ & _ THEORY.pdf [/ QUOTE]
                        Thanks 6666, good information.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X