Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PI for larger objects at greater depth....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PI for larger objects at greater depth....

    I'm working an area that has fist-sized non-ferrous nodules. Is there a PI circuit design that would maximize the depth I could detect these? I don't care about small target sensitivity. Would a large, (maybe 24 x 24) coil, with my modified TDI SL work for this?
    Many thanks,
    Jim

  • #2
    Do you know whether they give a fast or slow response? Generally with larger slow targets, a wider TX pulse width and wide sampling pulse, plus a large coil, will help a lot.

    Comment


    • #3
      The TDI SL won't work. At least alot of modifications needed.
      Integrator TC: you need to adjust integrators;
      Sample pulse widths: You need wider sample pulses (50-60) - with the MCU there it's a bit HARD
      Frequency: You need to adjust the frequency to a lower (500-600 is the MAX) - with the MCU there it's a bit HARD
      TX pulse width: you need at least 200us-300uS TX - with the MCU there it's a bit HARD
      You need to remove the SAT resistors from both channels, and maybe the 5.6M resistor

      As you can see alot of obstacles.

      Comment


      • #4
        Many thanks guys! Carl, this gives what I would call a slow response. It acts like a hot rock in some respects. Good hot signal that goes away fairly quickly as the coil is raised. It has a high resistance...in the neighborhood of 1.2megs/inch, but is a metal. It's got a high percentage of copper in it. I'm waiting on assay results now.
        So, is there a PI I could use as a base for mods? Something cheap, maybe....LOL
        I took the TM808 down there, and it can only see a 2lb hunk of this when the coil is almost on top of it. Goldmaster sees it fine, but can , with the 10" coil, only detect a 2oz piece at 10". At 12" can't see it at all. Pretty much the same for the TDI SL.
        Jim

        Comment


        • #5
          Sounds good field for Delta pulse isn't it? I guess the Baracuda with big enough coil may do too.

          Comment


          • #6
            I found a DP on EBay, and bought it. Not certain of what I bought, but the price was affordable.
            Jim

            https://www.ebay.com/itm/Deep-Metal-detector-DELTA-PULSE/164281796304?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid =p2057872.m2749.l2649


            Comment


            • #7
              Hi Jim,
              KT315 is currently selling a batch of Delta Pulse PCBs, you might want to contact him.
              Cheers

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by surfdetector View Post
                Hi Jim,
                KT315 is currently selling a batch of Delta Pulse PCBs, you might want to contact him.
                Cheers
                Yes, but I already bought one. It came today. I played with it tonight, getting use to the controls. With the 1 meter coil it detects my 1 kilo copper nugget at about 18". Almost exactly the same as the GM24K with the 8 x 14 coil. I think I need a smaller coil for the Delta P. I'm going to make a 2' square to start. See how that does, and go from there.
                Jim

                Comment


                • #9
                  I need some more help, guys. I'm trying to detect non-ferrous material golfball-sized and larger, at depth...maybe 24" deep. This material, is a high-conductor. It gives a low tone on my TDI SL. I'm going to make my own coils for the Delta Pulse. All things being equal, do I want a high inductance around 1,000uH, or low...350-500uH, to optimize my detecting. I'm thinking of a 20-24" coil. The 1 meter coil that came with the Delta is 600uH. It detects a 1 kilo hunk of this material at 17" in air. I'd like to do better.
                  I appreciate any help.
                  Jim

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jim in Idaho View Post
                    I need some more help, guys. I'm trying to detect non-ferrous material golfball-sized and larger, at depth...maybe 24" deep. This material, is a high-conductor. It gives a low tone on my TDI SL. I'm going to make my own coils for the Delta Pulse. All things being equal, do I want a high inductance around 1,000uH, or low...350-500uH, to optimize my detecting. I'm thinking of a 20-24" coil. The 1 meter coil that came with the Delta is 600uH. It detects a 1 kilo hunk of this material at 17" in air. I'd like to do better.
                    I appreciate any help.
                    Jim
                    Quite deep target fo such size. You can try to made flat coil 450-500 uH + 2 ohm resistor in series. Than Increase pulse width until power supply curent reach 120 mA. With these settings i detect 1 grivna coin up to 45 cm, yes, in the air offcourse. My coil are 27 cm in diameter. I can make foto of my coil, but little bit later.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Here is my coil foto. Inner diameter -24 cm, outher - 27,5 cm, number of turns ~27. I use 0.55 mm wire, but 0.4 - 0.5 mm will suit better.
                      (Inductance 473 uH, resistance 2 Ohm, coil only SFR 0,725 kHz, damping resistance 890 Ohm)
                      With this coil coin detecatble at 45 cm in the air, so i think with 17" coil you can detect your target easy.
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN6545.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	394.0 KB
ID:	357941
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN6550.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	359.6 KB
ID:	357942
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN6553.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	753.2 KB
ID:	357943

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        That is a really nice build, Vlad. Thanks you.
                        Jim

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          cache test of Carl. if you did not still read. https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...831-Cache-Test

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That's an informative read, KT...thanks!
                            Jim

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X