Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

conductive paint

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • conductive paint

    Hi All,

    Charles provided a link to a couple of shielding paints that can be used for coil shielding. Those paints are the electrodag and the aquadag. Now, both appear to work ok but they are both quite expensive.

    Wouldn't it be nice to find a paint that would work and cost a whole lot less? Well, that may be possible. There are some paints out there that will work. They just do not have the real low resistance of the ones mentioned above. Is the resistance low enough to work? For that answer I went searching for some info I found posted By George Payne some time back regarding the shielding. Here is what he said:

    "Sometimes there are very simple answers why some manufacturers use paint and others use foil or paper for the loop faraday shield. Usually it is related to ease of construction or cost, not necessarily to performance. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. And, you may only determine what those factors are by trial and error. My background has been in using paint shields. This process can be a little tricky if you don’t know what to avoid. For example. It’s best to have a very smooth surface on which to place the paint. Painting a shield on an irregular surface can cause excessive noise in the detector. If fact early Discovery loops had only the bottom cover painted in order to avoid too many surfaces that were not smooth. However, after some problems were worked out all their loops were 100%shielded. Making an electrical connection to a paint shield is difficult too. When I was with Teknetics we experimented with many correction methods before settling on one process that produced consistent results. A poor connection was prone to breaking loose or producing very high detector noise. Generally its best to have some distance between the shield and the coils. However, I have seen many designs were the shield is place directly on the wire. A foil shield for example. The conductivity of the shield must be low enough to not interfere with the detector operation. My personal experience has suggested that resistances around 10K ohms per square or optimum. However, the resistance can vary quite a bit without effecting detector operation. When this value drops below 1k then you can have pickup problems."


    Here is the link to that info:
    http://jb-ms.com/Baron/gb.htm

    Getting back to the shielding paint, I found a paint that is really quite cheap. The cost does vary depending upon where you purchase it and can range probably somewhere between about $8 and $14 a quart. Also it comes in different varieties and not all have been evaluated, but the spray paint has. Anyway, the paint is made by Van Sickle and goes by the name of EZ Slide. It comes in three different varieties inlcuding regular oil base, a combustible version, and waterborne mixture. They vary in the carrier of the graphite, more than the mix itself. I believe the waterborne and the combustible are new and were designed because of the limitations of shipping the oil base. Finally, this paint comes in a spray can which is very similar to the oil base in nature. This sells for about $5 a can.

    Last but not least, for those who want to try to make their own mixture or want to thicken the existing one, they sell a high quality graphite powder for a little more than $4 a lb.

    One place to purchase this paint is where I bought mine and that is P & R Supply. Here is the link to the page with the EZ Slide info:

    http://pandrsupply.com/SearchResult.aspx?CategoryID=24

    Just tell them Reg sent you. No, I don't get a discount if other people buy from them but they were extremely helpful and willing to send out as little as one can, so I told them I would try to steer business their way. Also, they were curious to know if the paint would work for the shielding application.

    One last note, if you do not like how this stuff works for shielding, then you can use it for its original intended use and that is to provide a very slippery surface. This paint is intended to be used as a coating on various surfaces to keep things from sticking. Good examples would be the bottom of a lawn mower, on a snowblower, maybe on a show shovel, etc, etc. Heck, I am even thinking about coating the undercarriage of my ATV or my vehicle to keep dirt from sticking and to reduce drag. Who knows, I might even pick up a mile per gallon. They say it works on power boats also.

    Now, one final note, I found the resistance of this paint to vary with the number and thickness of coatings. Using the spray I found a single coat can be as high as 5K or so and 3 coats can be down less then 300 ohms. BTW, it is messy so it should be used outside and proper precautions taken.

    Have fun. This stuff is great and has a lot of different uses. The beauty is, it is cheap.

    One last note, my first shielding attempt using the spray worked just fine. I had three coats on the bottom half of the coil housing and 1 good coat on the top. I may try just one good coat on both next time.

    Reg

  • #2
    Hi Reg,


    Long time no hear....hope all is well!!!


    I recently tried that EZ slide myself on a Sovereign coil I was building as a test coil and was pleasently surprised how well it worked. After spiral wrapping and adding one layer of black electrical tape on my TX and RX, I wrapped on a 3m product called micropore. It's sort of a flexible paper. I then wrapped a very thin wire around, spacing about an inch apart followed by 2 light coats of the EZ slide. When dried 1 more turn of black electrical tape was added for protection. Now I don't know if it is coincidence or not but this coil is the quietest one I have built so far. It is very easy to pick out deep targets. A little more work then the fabric tape but it does work very well. I highly recommend it!!!!

    And you are right it works great for other things like in my snow blower to prevent the snow from sticking in the shute.

    Best Regards,

    Bob

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Bob,

      All is fine here, hope all is well with you also.

      Glad to hear you had good luck with EZ Slide also. I was beginning to wonder if anyone was going to read the posting. When I fist applied it, I wasn't that sure about it because of the higher resistance reading. I had forgotten about George Payne's coil discussion and his resistance readings for the shielding for a VLF coil.

      The key to this stuff is it does knock the E field, so any extra noise shielding is a bonus. Your coil indicates that this might be happening.

      What type of EZ Slide did you use, the spray can or one of the various quart cans (paint on type)? BTW, their pure graphite powder is very high quality also and it should work well on any lock, door hinge or anything else that requires a dry lubricant.

      Keep me posted on anything else you find out about EZ Slide.

      Take care,

      Reg

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Reg,

        I used the RB-9512 Spray. I found it very easy to use and it dried quickly! This last coil was a 15x12 and if anything it should have been noisier in the salt water because of the larger size yet it was not. The stock ML Sovereigns also have a high R shield. The Coinsearch shield is sprayed on paper. The other stock coils are sprayed directly on the epoxy and then coated with additional epoxy.

        My next coil attempt will also use the EZ slide.

        Bob

        Comment


        • #5
          Aquadag is also used on pancake tubes or GM tubes used in the radiation field in probes. Thickness is very critical when applied to the membrane on the face of the tube.

          John Tomlinson, CET

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi John,

            Thanks for the info.

            My purpose for posting the information about the EZ Slide was to provide a source and name of very economical paint that appears to work well for shielding on coils. Paint is much easier to use than trying to wrap the individual windings, in many cases.

            In those cases where it is extremely difficult to wrap the windings, a paint applied to the housing or possibly to a piece of stiff paper lying above and below the windings could be used to eliminate the e field problem as well as provide some noise shielding capabilities. It is a simple and quick alternative.

            Now, the PI coil I built and tested using the graphite paine seemed to be very quiet also. On this housing, I simply sprayed the inside, both top and bottom with the graphite paint. I stripped a few inches of insulation off some 28 awg wire and spread out the small wires. The bare wire was then taped on to the painted surface. Ultimately, I will also spray over the tape and wires to assure a better bond.

            The lack of noise surprised me since I would have expected it to be more suseptible to noise. This is a good thing since I have several coil designs I want to try and many of them would be very difficult to build if I had to wrap the shielding on the windings. So, the paint alternative will make building those coils much easier.

            Reg

            Comment


            • #7
              FeO paint

              I found a very cheap way to do it when it's a large area.
              I got 1 pound of Iron Oxide (very fine ground .01 - like talkum power) and
              added it to a two part epoxy. I then painted it inside the project. It does take
              about three coats to build up enough to get a solid coat. You need the epoxy
              to be very viscus so not to have the FeO to get lumpy. I still use and like the
              3M copper tape but I did use the Iron Oxide once.

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi Reg and thank you for the post. Is this Reg Sniff ? I think coil building and theory is pretty cool. I think I have chatted with you before on the PI forum. Do you think that we are pretty much at a plateau with coil technology Reg ? Are you still working with rectangular coils ? Where is the best place to get coil forms or shells ? Ok Reg nice to chat with you and hope to get another post from you. God Bless you and be cool !

                John Tomlinson, CET
                Wirechief

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi John,

                  Yep, it is the same Reg.

                  As for coils, there will always be some improvements to be made and ideas tried. My guess is the next generation will be more coils and maybe multi layered. Who knows where it will all turn out to be the best.

                  I have several ideas I want to try just for fun.

                  As for coil housings, there are two places where one can obtain them. One is from Charles (NY) and the second is from Bill Hays of www.hayselectronics.com . At his website just select the parts bullseye and you can see the different sizes and shapes available. Bill recently added pics of the rectangular coil housings he makes plus one smaller elliptical design. Charles has pics on this site in different places.

                  Finally, I am still working with rectangular coils. I have a few ideas I want to try with them also.

                  So, between the various design ideas I want to try, I needed some other means of shielding besides the wrapping of the windings. Some windings have to be very flexible for my latest applications. As an example, one design has 3 different receive windings. It looks weird but works. Unfortunately, like all the other ground canceling coils, there is some depth loss. The plus of this particular coil design is the center winding is the main detection coil so it acts just like a regular coil but with ground canceling capabilities.

                  So, that is why I went looking for something cheap I could use for shielding paint.

                  Reg

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hi Reg, well I'm glad to run into you again my friend. Thank you for the info on a place to get coil forms. I will check them out.Reg is the coil that has 3 receive windings a circular coplanar type or rectangular ? That must look really cool. Are you using it on the Eric Foster PI type instrument ? Are you using your coils for gold nugget hunting mostly ? How do you determine when you think you have the right thickness of aquadag on the coil ? Ok Reg I will CU later and you take care. God Bless.

                    John Tomlinson, CET
                    Wirechief

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hi John,

                      Good to talk to you again.

                      Now, the coil is a basic coplaner design mounted in an elliptical housing. The transmit winding is like any mono type design and it fits the inside of the housing. There is one main receive running down the center and two smaller receive coils, one on each side of the main receive winding. The two smaller coils are reverse wound so they cancel the main receive coil ground signal. One can sort of think of it as a double twist figure 8 design.

                      As you might imagine, this type of design would be difficult to shield using the conventional techniques of wrapping the individual windings. In fact, just the initial layout can be a problem if certain tricks aren't used.

                      Now, here is another trick I used when trying different multiple shapes. I used velcro strips (self adhesive) type stuck to the housing and positioned such that the windings would cross the strips. Then the other half of the velcro was added to hold the windings in place. The technique worked extremely well for testing since it would allow the shapes to be modified easily.

                      Reg

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        John,

                        Here is a simple pic of the three receive coil design. I forgot to attach it to the last posting.

                        Reg
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi Radioactive,

                          Your idea of using iron oxide mixed in a paint is quite innovative. Did you find the oxide causing any problems? Also, where did you find the oxide? Is it that common and easy to get?

                          Reg

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Reg
                            John,

                            Here is a simple pic of the three receive coil design. I forgot to attach it to the last posting.

                            Reg
                            Hey Reg, thank you for the attached diagram and that is really cool. I know your trying to decrease ground noise but also with the extra amount of wire does that sort of provide a larger capture area for the desired signals ? Ok Reg I really thank you for the trouble your going to but I bet a lot of lookers like it too. Ok I will see if I can find another question and chat with you soon. God Bless.

                            John Tomlinson, CET

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi John,

                              The 3 coil design both ground cancels and noise cancels so it is very quiet when the receive coils are properly adjusted. The down side is some ultimate depth loss when compared to a mono coil operating under idea conditions.

                              Now, this design of a coil would work well on a PI that has no ground balance and in many places would provide improved depth. So, there is an advantage to such a design in some locations.

                              One way to make such a design is to simply calculate the total size of the three coils and make one large coil a little larger than twice the size of the center receive coil. Then the large coil is divided into the three by a half twist on each side. The result is the three coils.

                              Now, the basic sizing is such that the sum of the area of the two side coils about equals the main center detection coil. So, the initial layout is reasonably simple. From there it is just a matter of minor adjustments to coil sizes.

                              If the secondary coils are too large then you get sort of a reverse ground signal, so it is easy to figure out just what needs to be done. By using the technique I mentioned earlier of using Velcro to hold the coils in place, the final sizing and shape is a simple and quick process. If the housings already have shielding then once the coils are correctly aligned, they can be glued in place using one of several methods.

                              The idea of a coil on each side is to reduce any dramatic ground signal change should the coil be tilted sideways.

                              Now, as I mentioned before, this type of design works best if the shielding is done using paint, rather than applying a tape to the windings.

                              Reg

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X