Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Halo Effect - WTF !!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I was just about to say same thing!
    Ok...mostly in South America is hot, pretty hot, not a big issue - walkig bare feet arround. Yet...it presents variabile resistance not constant!? So...?
    Take unimeter probes and pull those over your skin Esteban. You will see resistance is jumping randomly - not constant. How accurate could be your instrument with such unpredictable "element"?

    Comment


    • #62
      R2 should be a capacitor...if you use shoes and it´s not raining... :-)

      Comment


      • #63
        Interaction between magnetic fields

        Originally posted by ivconic View Post
        "..There you can see the Galvanic Series of metals. Any time you have 2 dissimilar metals in contact with each other through an electrolyte, you have an electric potential.
        In the instance of gold and zinc, for example, this potential is about 1,25 Volts. The amount of current flowing between the 2 metals will depend on the quality of the electrolyte and the surface area of each metal.

        Any time you have some current flowing, you have ion migration and an electro magnetic field.

        Plain facts out of the text book...."

        * 2 dissimilar metal, one near (or in contact) other is one thing - metal alloy is quite another thing.
        * ground battery phenomena is known to me,you dont need to explain much
        *current flowing,ion migration.....em field? which type of current you are talking about here?


        Yes, logically, we can bury battery in a wet soil and perform some tests...right?
        A better test would be to bury a sheet of copper and a sheet of galvanized steel parallel in a sand box.
        Before you bury, attach a wire lead on each plate
        Then poor an electrolyte into the space between the 2 metal sheets.
        For an electrolyte you can dissolve one pound of baking soda in 5 gallon of water.

        You can now measure a voltage between the 2 wires. If you connect the 2 wires, you can measure a current.
        The amplitude of the current or voltage is dependent upon the size and the distance of the dissimilar metal sheets.

        This IS a single cell battery. In the case you used baking soda, it is an alkaline battery.

        Now, if you do nothing else, the current will flow from the copper sheet ( Cathode ) to the zinc sheet (Anode) until the zinc has all migrated, ion after ion, to the copper sheet.

        The electro magnetic field the surrounding your ground battery is proportional to the amount of current flowing.

        Now, what will happen if you connect a car battery to the leads that reverses the current?

        Or what happens if you apply an external magnetic field?

        You know the magnetic fields do not cancel each other, they deflect and distort.

        Now figure out the complex interaction between the earth's magnetic field, your ground battery magnetic field and the magnetic field produced by your metal detector......

        I am really enjoying this discussion. It reminds me of my times as an under water welder when I used the seawater as a conductor instead of the ground cable, to weld with 550 Amps on the rod. Bit of a magnetic field there. Used to zap the fish and octopus for my lunch.

        Tinkerer

        Comment


        • #64
          Human body's sensitivity to magnetic fields

          Originally posted by Esteban View Post
          Maybe this is more clear... or not?
          I read somewhere that one way to test a persons capability to work with LRL's, is to run a magnetic field test.

          Bury a wire and connect a battery with a potentiometer in series to the wire. Use ever smaller current to be detected by the LRL man.
          If the LRL man can detect micro Amps, he has a good chance to be able to detect buried treasure.

          Tinkerer

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Fred View Post
            R2 should be a capacitor...if you use shoes and it´s not raining... :-)
            Or there are no snakes and poisonous insects around.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by ivconic View Post
              I was just about to say same thing!
              Ok...mostly in South America is hot, pretty hot, not a big issue - walkig bare feet arround. Yet...it presents variabile resistance not constant!? So...?
              Take unimeter probes and pull those over your skin Esteban. You will see resistance is jumping randomly - not constant. How accurate could be your instrument with such unpredictable "element"?
              Yes, but sometimes when I pass instrument to other person with leather shoes, for example, you need to readjust the sensibility point. Your resistence is constant include walking, maybe there is imperceptible changes. Soil resistence varies, but your resistence stay more constant.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Fred View Post
                R2 should be a capacitor...if you use shoes and it´s not raining... :-)
                Yes, OK, look a capacitor when you use gum shoes, but also capacitor has resistence component. Leather shoes with nails is resistive and not capacitive, for example. Resistive I drawn regarding different resistences of material, gum, leather, etc.

                Regards

                Esteban

                Comment


                • #68
                  Your resistence is characteristic of any person, I think, maybe there are changes. Soil resistence varies, but your resistence stay more constant.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    It would be very interesting to test it from a car.Then you will know exactly what influence has your isolation.In ionic detectors we need extra high resistence ,hundreds of Mhoms,so this could give some hint.
                    regards,
                    Fred.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Tinkerer i envy you on underwater experiences! Among most of all things in life i adore water and underwater activities. Reminds me on splendid time i spent on Creta island, back in '90-eese.
                      Well...your experiences are showing some facts.
                      Yet...speaking of detecting at long distances, i keep imaging single bronze coin (bronze alloy), burried for more than 1500 years in soil. Such small volumen as coin, with such inpurified alloys even if evolved some "field" arround it, it is hard to beleive that field is enough significant in surrounding soil conditions to be detected at long distances, let's say more than 30-40cm away...personally i have doubts.

                      Esteban...skin resistance at only one person do change minute per minute.
                      Interesting subject to be examined in another, new thread. Some claims (and i do beleive) skin resistance changes are directly connected to many factors. Among others, the "mood" factor is one of major which influencing resistances. If you are clam,rested and just awaked, you will measure one resitance, but later when you are tired,exhausted or even nervous, you gonna measure quite different resitance....let's say between previously choosen spots on a skin. Try, experiment, and you will see...

                      Alternative medicine claims that healthfull person do have high skin resistances, other hand sick persons do have low resistances!? Is it true? I dont know.
                      I think this is directly correlated with amount of electrolitisc in skin tissue. That amount also changes from time to time....
                      Need to be explored more...

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Interaction of several magnetic fields

                        Originally posted by ivconic View Post
                        Tinkerer i envy you on underwater experiences! Among most of all things in life i adore water and underwater activities. Reminds me on splendid time i spent on Creta island, back in '90-eese.
                        Well...your experiences are showing some facts.
                        Yet...speaking of detecting at long distances, i keep imaging single bronze coin (bronze alloy), burried for more than 1500 years in soil. Such small volumen as coin, with such inpurified alloys even if evolved some "field" arround it, it is hard to beleive that field is enough significant in surrounding soil conditions to be detected at long distances, let's say more than 30-40cm away...personally i have doubts.

                        Esteban...skin resistance at only one person do change minute per minute.
                        Interesting subject to be examined in another, new thread. Some claims (and i do beleive) skin resistance changes are directly connected to many factors. Among others, the "mood" factor is one of major which influencing resistances. If you are clam,rested and just awaked, you will measure one resitance, but later when you are tired,exhausted or even nervous, you gonna measure quite different resitance....let's say between previously choosen spots on a skin. Try, experiment, and you will see...

                        Alternative medicine claims that healthfull person do have high skin resistances, other hand sick persons do have low resistances!? Is it true? I dont know.
                        I think this is directly correlated with amount of electrolitisc in skin tissue. That amount also changes from time to time....
                        Need to be explored more...
                        Ivconic,

                        As often happens, several actually different topics got mixed up again.
                        We were talking about the halo effect, what could cause it and how a metal detector could sense it.

                        I agree with you that the distance would be only as far as a metal detector normally reaches. Maybe a fraction more at best.
                        However if we speculate that a newly buried coin could be sensed at a distance of say 40 cm, the same coin after a few hundred years under conditions that favor ion migration, could be sensed maybe 50% further.

                        All depends on "favorable conditions".

                        What interests me more is to figure out how to design a metal detector that takes advantage of the interaction of the various magnetic fields, that can under favorable conditions, produce a magnetic field.

                        I am therefore going to start a new thread about the interactions of magnetic fields as pertaining to metal detecting. I would much appreciate your input to that discussion.

                        About LRL's, I would prefer to keep the subjects apart from the subject of metal detectors.

                        I will start a new thread also for LRL related observations. Maybe one day we will be able to unify the two different subjects, something like Einstein's unified field theory.

                        Tinkerer

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Tinkerer View Post
                          A better test would be to bury a sheet of copper and a sheet of galvanized steel parallel in a sand box.
                          Before you bury, attach a wire lead on each plate
                          Then poor an electrolyte into the space between the 2 metal sheets.
                          For an electrolyte you can dissolve one pound of baking soda in 5 gallon of water.

                          You can now measure a voltage between the 2 wires. If you connect the 2 wires, you can measure a current.
                          The amplitude of the current or voltage is dependent upon the size and the distance of the dissimilar metal sheets.

                          This IS a single cell battery. In the case you used baking soda, it is an alkaline battery.

                          Now, if you do nothing else, the current will flow from the copper sheet ( Cathode ) to the zinc sheet (Anode) until the zinc has all migrated, ion after ion, to the copper sheet.

                          The electro magnetic field the surrounding your ground battery is proportional to the amount of current flowing.

                          Now, what will happen if you connect a car battery to the leads that reverses the current?

                          Or what happens if you apply an external magnetic field?

                          You know the magnetic fields do not cancel each other, they deflect and distort.

                          Now figure out the complex interaction between the earth's magnetic field, your ground battery magnetic field and the magnetic field produced by your metal detector......

                          I am really enjoying this discussion. It reminds me of my times as an under water welder when I used the seawater as a conductor instead of the ground cable, to weld with 550 Amps on the rod. Bit of a magnetic field there. Used to zap the fish and octopus for my lunch.

                          Tinkerer
                          Am I ignorant if I say that I don't think most VLF TR metal detectors respond to static magnetic fields really. They respond to changing magnetic flux at the frequency they transmit. Yes they do respond to ionic solutions as we know from salt water at the beach, because any substance that can respond to the transmit signal either by conductance or a magnetic quality (parametic) can affect the receive signal. But they don't respond to a magnetic field itself unless it is oscillating so the receive circuit would pick it up.

                          So I think the "galvanic current" magnetic field, which is static, would not really affect the detector or be detected. However, any conductive paths or paramagnetic materials created by the "battery in the ground" could respond to the transmit signal.

                          Also, magnetic fields don't interact, they just superimpose, don't they, like electric fields?

                          However, it is perfectly possible to design a detector to be sensitive to static magnetic fields. Just use a receive coil without a transmitter, and amplify signals at your sweep frequency -- very noisy, but would work. You would want sweep at constant angle to earth magnetic field to cancel it out.

                          Those are my ideas from school physics. I may experiment with it.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            "...As often happens, several actually different topics got mixed up again...."

                            "Wide" questions usually give "wide" answers. It is hard to focus only on one thing here, to much questions involved.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Halo Effect-WTF !!!!

                              GO TO THE GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE AND TYPE IN " HALO EFFECT METEORITES" AND ALL KINDS OF THINGS WILL POP UP FOR YOUR RESEARCH !!!!!!! IT DOES EXIST. BUT WHAT IT'S TRUE DEFINITION IS ? I DO NOT UNDERSTAND YET !!! BYE ................EUGENE

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Static magnetic fields

                                Originally posted by simonbaker View Post
                                Am I ignorant if I say that I don't think most VLF TR metal detectors respond to static magnetic fields really. They respond to changing magnetic flux at the frequency they transmit. Yes they do respond to ionic solutions as we know from salt water at the beach, because any substance that can respond to the transmit signal either by conductance or a magnetic quality (parametic) can affect the receive signal. But they don't respond to a magnetic field itself unless it is oscillating so the receive circuit would pick it up.

                                So I think the "galvanic current" magnetic field, which is static, would not really affect the detector or be detected. However, any conductive paths or paramagnetic materials created by the "battery in the ground" could respond to the transmit signal.

                                Also, magnetic fields don't interact, they just superimpose, don't they, like electric fields?

                                However, it is perfectly possible to design a detector to be sensitive to static magnetic fields. Just use a receive coil without a transmitter, and amplify signals at your sweep frequency -- very noisy, but would work. You would want sweep at constant angle to earth magnetic field to cancel it out.

                                Those are my ideas from school physics. I may experiment with it.
                                I agree with you that the magnetic fields created by the galvanic currents are static..... until the target and its field are zapped by the dynamic field of the metal detector. I am not sure what happens then.

                                Does something similar happen to a battery when you apply external power to recharge it?

                                Is it possible that this "recharge" takes a few micro seconds to decay and can thus be sensed?

                                Tinkerer

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X