Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Focus coil as magnetometer polarisation coil

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Focus coil as magnetometer polarisation coil

    Hi all,

    Last week I salvaged a focus coil's from a scrap klystron.
    My intention is to use it as the polarisation coil for a proton magnetometer.

    The dimensions from this coil are :

    Inner diameter : 25.5cm
    Outer diameter : 37cm
    Height : 3.5cm
    Layers stacked on each other : 36
    Weight : +/- 14kg
    DC Resistance with an ohm meter is about 0.2 ohm

    The problem I have is that the 'wire' is not round but rectangular. (about 4mm (height) x 1mm)

    a) I can't find formulas to calculate the inductance where the wire is rectangular, so if anyody can help calculating inductance that would be great.
    b) would such thing work as a polarisation coil for a proton precession magnetometer ?

    I've made some pics to clarify things up :




  • #2
    I presume you do not have an inductance meter?

    Comment


    • #3
      No, not at the moment and frankly i want to know the theoretical point of view from not round wires in coils also

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by spacer76 View Post
        No, not at the moment and frankly i want to know the theoretical point of view from not round wires in coils also
        I would expect the effect of square versus round wires would be an increase in inductance. Using my own coil calculator, I get an estimated inductance in excess of 1H.
        My assumption is that there are 2088 turns on the coil.

        I do not have a formula for square cross-section wires.

        Comment


        • #5
          that´s strange, my guess is 280 turns ...is that a typo?
          There is surely an increase in capacitance anyway, so resonant frequency will be diferent from round wire.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Fred View Post
            that´s strange, my guess is 280 turns ...is that a typo?
            There is surely an increase in capacitance anyway, so resonant frequency will be diferent from round wire.
            height of coil winding = 35mm
            number of vertical layers = 36
            wire thickness = 35/36 = 0.97mm
            width of coil winding = (outer diameter - inner diameter)/2 = 57.5mm
            number of horizontal layers = 57.5/0.97 = 59.3 (let's say 59)
            total number of windings = 36 x 59 = 2124

            Last time I rounded the numbers earlier in the calculation.
            If there were 280 total turns, then you would only have about 8 turns in the horizontal layer.

            Comment


            • #7
              OK - I see the problem.

              The 36 layers are vertical, not horizontal. In that case:

              width of coil winding = (outer diameter - inner diameter)/2 = 57.5mm
              wire thickness = 57.5/36 = 1.6mm
              number of horizontal layers = 35/1.6 = 22
              total number of windings = 36 x 22 = 792

              approximate inductance = 272mH

              That probably makes more sense.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                That probably makes more sense.
                not really:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	SH105632k.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	32.6 KB
ID:	322975

                Click image for larger version

Name:	SH105635k.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	19.5 KB
ID:	322976

                36X8=288

                where is the mistake ?

                Edit: i see , you assumed round (or square) wire

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fred View Post
                  not really:

                  [ATTACH]9185[/ATTACH]

                  [ATTACH]9186[/ATTACH]

                  36X8=288

                  where is the mistake ?

                  Edit: i see , you assumed round (or square) wire
                  Yes - I agree. It looks like 36 x 8 from the photos.

                  I think the mistake is assuming that the wire is square, when in fact it is rectangular. In other words, it's a flat cross-section.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X