What value should I use as inner radius for a D-shaped coil? Should I measure the length of one full turn, assume it a circle and divide by (pi * 2) ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sticky coil calculator: how to calculate inductance of a D-shaped coil?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mullihaka View PostWhat value should I use as inner radius for a D-shaped coil? Should I measure the length of one full turn, assume it a circle and divide by (pi * 2) ?
In order to get a good value for the narrow diameter, you will also need to estimate the coil overlap. There is a discussion on this subject somewhere in the forum.
The formula is: x = pi * r * k / 2
where:
x = the coil overlap
r = the radius of the overall DD coil
k = 0.1 (empirically determined)
For example:
For a 27cm DD coil shell, the actual overall search head diameter is 255mm, which requires an overlap of 20mm.
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skippy View PostThis thread contains useful information:http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17786
Comment
-
Qioazhi: There appears to be more than one 'Wheeler's Formula'. The one mentioned in the article you linked to does seem to apply to solenoids. I've used a different variant, which seemed better suited to the 'search-coil' arrangement. I can't remember where I got my copy from, but here's another pdf version I've located:
http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/...3155331811.pdf
This is simpler than your 'coil-calculator' formula, (which I agree is accurate), but this does make it easier to mathematically rearrange, to suit the various practicalities of the design process.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Skippy View PostQioazhi: There appears to be more than one 'Wheeler's Formula'. The one mentioned in the article you linked to does seem to apply to solenoids. I've used a different variant, which seemed better suited to the 'search-coil' arrangement. I can't remember where I got my copy from, but here's another pdf version I've located:
http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/...3155331811.pdf
This is simpler than your 'coil-calculator' formula, (which I agree is accurate), but this does make it easier to mathematically rearrange, to suit the various practicalities of the design process.
I did once write a version of the Coil Calculator where any of the parameters could be determined from the other values, but I don't seem to have that any more. It was just easier to alter the input parameters until you got the desired value of inductance.
Comment
Comment