Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

11" coil for SD series vs GP Extreme

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 11" coil for SD series vs GP Extreme

    In the middle of my attempt get my GP Extreme working I purchased a second coil off Craigslist. The original was a black model 110 that came with the GP. The Craigslist coil was white Minelab Goldscan DD for SD series. I fixed the detector and the original coil now works great. But the white Goldscan doesn't work well at all. A quarter is detected only within 2 or 3 inches from the coil vs over a foot with the black standard coil.
    Measurements taken off the coils:
    Using LC102 LCR meter (L):
    Goldscan TX 291uH RX 483uH both in series 760uH
    Black 1100 TX 290uH RX 403uH both in series 673uH

    Using B&K 875B (resistance):
    Goldscan TX .39 ohms RX 17.62 ohms in series 18.02 ohms
    Black 1100 TX .42 ohms RX 17.34 ohms in series 17.78 ohms

    Not much difference between TX/TX RX/RX if I run them off a Surf PI clone output and look with a scope. RX on 1100 is a bit faster.
    So is this an intentional design difference and the Goldscan is not appropriate in some way for the GP? In a few days I'll try frequency resonance and capacitance tests...

  • #2
    Sorry, the writing on the white coil says "Super Goldsearch" not "Goldscan".

    Comment


    • #3
      I found the answer - direct from Minelab Australia. The older Super Goldsearch coils are for SD series only and not upward compatible. All coils are downward compatible. So this one goes on ebay I guess.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by bklein View Post
        I found the answer - direct from Minelab Australia. The older Super Goldsearch coils are for SD series only and not upward compatible. All coils are downward compatible. So this one goes on ebay I guess.
        maybe this is an issue only in DD. On the other hand,all mono coils probably are "universal"

        Comment

        Working...
        X