Tweet
Re: Chemical Action around Metal in the Soil
Carl, Eric, Rich and Sam, I have listened with interest. I am not the scientest that you are. I am a crash and burn inventer. Sometime things work just miraculously because two or more things were constructed in a certain way that no one else thought of before because of a common mind thread.
The transister, X-ray and synthetic robber were discovered by some dummy that made a laboratory mistake.
What you all are saying is correct to me with certain small differences, all sharings are about the same.
I have been in the field 30 years as a field investagator. I have solved the location of Drakes Nova Albion and his 72 ton silver treasure cache (seen on http://home.earthlink.net/~eltesoro/drake.htm)and an host of other massive noble metal sites now waiting organized recovery people.
I know the effects of cached noble metals as much as anyone in the world I suppose.
I invented a system, that isn't known, that was the result of a crash and burn idea that worked. It was a long time before I realized what the device was doing. I almost junked it. Finally, after having the patience to use it in the field, I began to see what it was doing and the amazing effects it was causing.
The Drake story is a result of what can be done and discovered with this device or limited understanding. The same thing is true of Edisons radio effect on his light bulbs. One just has to recognize something and be curious to investagate the possibilities even though one's pears may be doing cart wheels in the lunch room.
All of what you said are true. But this to me isn't the field problem that foils MFDs, dowsing rods and about every other known devices for finding old cached massive noble metals.
Let me give you a good example of what I mean and I will let you digest what I have said and try to comment on this REAl field problem in a scientific and constructive way.
Here is the example: In 1980 I discovered the Famous Lost Cememnt mine that was reported in the San Francisco Post in 1879 by James W. Wright. There or books out on the market now which are copied from this newspaper. Wright did the field investagation for the story, plus he witnessed miners etc.
Ok, 100 years later I found this mine that produced 1,500 troy ounces before it was sealed in 1879. I was so excited! I ran down to the California Historical department and I said, "I found the Lost Cement mine that had created the establishment the forming of Bobie, Auroa, Lindy and Mammoth lakes. All of these mining area yeilded gold, but the lost Cement mine was lost until today, I muttered" The desk person said yawn, oh really? Next I tried to interest mining people. No one gave a hoot. So the mine just sits there.
Anyway men, the axium I wanted to introduce for you now, is this: The Lost Cement Mine can only be read 25 miles away. Why? I think because it is completely natural with nature.
Now the Drake site and Maxmillions loot in Texas can be read 400 miles away and more. Why is this true? We are boardering the REAL field problem here I think. I personally don't think this condition is caused by geochemical actions.
This condition is a nut house to use instruments within. To me this is a highly magnetic system. This is only my opinion. But the commercial boats that operate out of Tiburon have to have their compasses and navagation equipment set up crazy or they will crash in a fog. Why? Because their compasses are off 20 to 170 degrees in this area. Sure, the Government has said, " Gosh guys, there is iron in the area".
I personally don't believe this because this situation exists on all 60 of my sites. Alleged Treasure Hunting equipment will NOT operate within one mile of the cache. WHY? This is what I hope we will all learn. What is this varmet? I have my own special procedure for working within this environment, but it isn't perfect yet.
Thanks for the concideration.
Best wishes,
Richard
>As with most things of this nature, there always seem to be more questions than answers, and lots of considerations to think about.
>When time permits, I want to try a few of the experiments that were outlined above. I'll let you know what sort of results I get.
Carl, Eric, Rich and Sam, I have listened with interest. I am not the scientest that you are. I am a crash and burn inventer. Sometime things work just miraculously because two or more things were constructed in a certain way that no one else thought of before because of a common mind thread.
The transister, X-ray and synthetic robber were discovered by some dummy that made a laboratory mistake.
What you all are saying is correct to me with certain small differences, all sharings are about the same.
I have been in the field 30 years as a field investagator. I have solved the location of Drakes Nova Albion and his 72 ton silver treasure cache (seen on http://home.earthlink.net/~eltesoro/drake.htm)and an host of other massive noble metal sites now waiting organized recovery people.
I know the effects of cached noble metals as much as anyone in the world I suppose.
I invented a system, that isn't known, that was the result of a crash and burn idea that worked. It was a long time before I realized what the device was doing. I almost junked it. Finally, after having the patience to use it in the field, I began to see what it was doing and the amazing effects it was causing.
The Drake story is a result of what can be done and discovered with this device or limited understanding. The same thing is true of Edisons radio effect on his light bulbs. One just has to recognize something and be curious to investagate the possibilities even though one's pears may be doing cart wheels in the lunch room.
All of what you said are true. But this to me isn't the field problem that foils MFDs, dowsing rods and about every other known devices for finding old cached massive noble metals.
Let me give you a good example of what I mean and I will let you digest what I have said and try to comment on this REAl field problem in a scientific and constructive way.
Here is the example: In 1980 I discovered the Famous Lost Cememnt mine that was reported in the San Francisco Post in 1879 by James W. Wright. There or books out on the market now which are copied from this newspaper. Wright did the field investagation for the story, plus he witnessed miners etc.
Ok, 100 years later I found this mine that produced 1,500 troy ounces before it was sealed in 1879. I was so excited! I ran down to the California Historical department and I said, "I found the Lost Cement mine that had created the establishment the forming of Bobie, Auroa, Lindy and Mammoth lakes. All of these mining area yeilded gold, but the lost Cement mine was lost until today, I muttered" The desk person said yawn, oh really? Next I tried to interest mining people. No one gave a hoot. So the mine just sits there.
Anyway men, the axium I wanted to introduce for you now, is this: The Lost Cement Mine can only be read 25 miles away. Why? I think because it is completely natural with nature.
Now the Drake site and Maxmillions loot in Texas can be read 400 miles away and more. Why is this true? We are boardering the REAL field problem here I think. I personally don't think this condition is caused by geochemical actions.
This condition is a nut house to use instruments within. To me this is a highly magnetic system. This is only my opinion. But the commercial boats that operate out of Tiburon have to have their compasses and navagation equipment set up crazy or they will crash in a fog. Why? Because their compasses are off 20 to 170 degrees in this area. Sure, the Government has said, " Gosh guys, there is iron in the area".
I personally don't believe this because this situation exists on all 60 of my sites. Alleged Treasure Hunting equipment will NOT operate within one mile of the cache. WHY? This is what I hope we will all learn. What is this varmet? I have my own special procedure for working within this environment, but it isn't perfect yet.
Thanks for the concideration.
Best wishes,
Richard
>As with most things of this nature, there always seem to be more questions than answers, and lots of considerations to think about.
>When time permits, I want to try a few of the experiments that were outlined above. I'll let you know what sort of results I get.
Comment