Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fluxgate Depth of Penetration

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fluxgate Depth of Penetration

    hmmm.. Sorry for al extra posts...


    jan

  • #2
    Re: Older style IB/TR: obsolete or not?

    From what I continue to read on MD forums the old Compass detectors are the ones to beat for use in nail-infested areas. I've been on the lookout for one at a good price.


    - Carl

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Older style IB/TR: obsolete or not?

      From what I continue to read on MD forums the old Compass detectors are the ones to beat for use in nail-infested areas. I've been on the lookout for one at a good price.


      - Carl

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Older style IB/TR: obsolete or not?

        From what I continue to read on MD forums the old Compass detectors are the ones to beat for use in nail-infested areas. I've been on the lookout for one at a good price.


        - Carl

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: magnum - transistors

          >Hi !


          >I just started building magnum detector but I can't find following transistors:


          >BC 184L


          >BC 214L


          >and a nightmare :-( BFX 29


          >What transistors I could use instead or at least maybe someone had some info about bfx 29 or other?


          The way these transistors are used in the circuit makes their types pretty non-critical. Things should work just fine if you use 2N3904's for the NPNs and 2N3906's for the PNPs. The BFX29 is the only one you might want to consider differently - if you're only driving headphones then the 2N3906 should be OK; if you're driving an 8 ohm speaker then you might want to use a TO-220 type PNP (like a TIP32).


          Lets us know how it turns out!


          - Carl

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: magnum - transistors

            >Hi !


            >I just started building magnum detector but I can't find following transistors:


            >BC 184L


            >BC 214L


            >and a nightmare :-( BFX 29


            >What transistors I could use instead or at least maybe someone had some info about bfx 29 or other?


            The way these transistors are used in the circuit makes their types pretty non-critical. Things should work just fine if you use 2N3904's for the NPNs and 2N3906's for the PNPs. The BFX29 is the only one you might want to consider differently - if you're only driving headphones then the 2N3906 should be OK; if you're driving an 8 ohm speaker then you might want to use a TO-220 type PNP (like a TIP32).


            Lets us know how it turns out!


            - Carl

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: magnum - transistors

              >Hi !


              >I just started building magnum detector but I can't find following transistors:


              >BC 184L


              >BC 214L


              >and a nightmare :-( BFX 29


              >What transistors I could use instead or at least maybe someone had some info about bfx 29 or other?


              The way these transistors are used in the circuit makes their types pretty non-critical. Things should work just fine if you use 2N3904's for the NPNs and 2N3906's for the PNPs. The BFX29 is the only one you might want to consider differently - if you're only driving headphones then the 2N3906 should be OK; if you're driving an 8 ohm speaker then you might want to use a TO-220 type PNP (like a TIP32).


              Lets us know how it turns out!


              - Carl

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: magnum - transistors

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: magnum - transistors

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: magnum - transistors

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Fluxgate Depth of Penetration

                      How deep can Carl Moreland's Fluxgate Gradiometer penetrate?

                      Any one with an idea?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Fluxgate Depth of Penetration

                        Depends on the size of the target. Also, unlike with a metal detector, solid objects are easier to detect than, say, a hollow can. I believe on a large cast iron target (size of an auto engine) I was getting 10-15 feet, don't recall exactly.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Fluxgate Depth of Penetration

                          Carl,

                          Thanks for the reply.

                          By the way, am looking for a Earth Resistivity Meter with a higher voltage output. O have read like Geotrade's GTR-2 with an optional DC-Converter. I think this give a higher voltage otput. Do you have any idea how this is done or any web site you can poin me to?

                          Thanks again.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X