For your info, this is the clear illustration of the influence of the man activities to the earth field.
In principle, in the middle of nowhere (sea, desert,large forest,...), the true diurnal variations are measured in a few nT (1 or 2) per minute. In those environments, the magnetic surveys are very well made with a single mag.
These two plots were taken in my garden by two distinct but synchronized mags whose single sensors were kept at a fixed location and separated by 3 meters for a period of 15 minutes. The readings were repeated at a rate of one per 1.5 seconds.
You can see how much the field varies in parallel on the two fixed stations between readings proving that they are not induced by the system themselves.
The main reasons for those large variations are the underground currents generated by powerful electrical activities with not too good groundings. The electrical railways are mainly responsible for those currents which are triggering their effects several kilometers away.
As an example, I know that the earth field observatory in Belgium installed in the middle of a large forest has blocked all projects of electrifying the railway network in their all region.
The variations are slightly lower in the countryside, far from any house or power line but, in my own experience, they are still there.
In conclusion, surveys made in the countryside, in rivers or in lakes should use a gradiometer or a differential PPM configurations to correctly detect and locate earth field anomalies of a few nT's (5 to 10).
Willy
In principle, in the middle of nowhere (sea, desert,large forest,...), the true diurnal variations are measured in a few nT (1 or 2) per minute. In those environments, the magnetic surveys are very well made with a single mag.
These two plots were taken in my garden by two distinct but synchronized mags whose single sensors were kept at a fixed location and separated by 3 meters for a period of 15 minutes. The readings were repeated at a rate of one per 1.5 seconds.
You can see how much the field varies in parallel on the two fixed stations between readings proving that they are not induced by the system themselves.
The main reasons for those large variations are the underground currents generated by powerful electrical activities with not too good groundings. The electrical railways are mainly responsible for those currents which are triggering their effects several kilometers away.
As an example, I know that the earth field observatory in Belgium installed in the middle of a large forest has blocked all projects of electrifying the railway network in their all region.
The variations are slightly lower in the countryside, far from any house or power line but, in my own experience, they are still there.
In conclusion, surveys made in the countryside, in rivers or in lakes should use a gradiometer or a differential PPM configurations to correctly detect and locate earth field anomalies of a few nT's (5 to 10).
Willy
Comment