Have done some reading about ppm fluids. Seems most use
water or an alcohol (ethanol, methanol).
If I understand (please correct me as needed
) the ppm
detects the protons in hydrogen as they spin out of
alignment.
So it seems that if the fluid has relatively more H it will
generate a stronger signal. With this in mind, I spent a few
minutes with wikipedia and a spreadsheet (OpenOfficeCalc)
and found the following:
Six "fluids" are listed with their formulas, densities, and % of
H relative to water. I used molecular weights and grams/mol
to derive the result.
So, given the potential for a 20% gain in signal strength,
has anyone used paraffin (wax) as a working fluid? If not,
why? It seems that because it is "solid" at room temps
it would be quite easy to work with.
regards,
thom
water or an alcohol (ethanol, methanol).
If I understand (please correct me as needed

detects the protons in hydrogen as they spin out of
alignment.
So it seems that if the fluid has relatively more H it will
generate a stronger signal. With this in mind, I spent a few
minutes with wikipedia and a spreadsheet (OpenOfficeCalc)
and found the following:
Code:
Substance Formula Density %H Water H2O 1.00 100.0 Propane C3H8 0.58 95.4 Butane C4H10 0.60 92.9 Methanol CH4O 0.79 88.4 Ethanol C2H6O 0.79 92.2 Paraffin C25H52 0.93 123.6
Six "fluids" are listed with their formulas, densities, and % of
H relative to water. I used molecular weights and grams/mol
to derive the result.
So, given the potential for a 20% gain in signal strength,
has anyone used paraffin (wax) as a working fluid? If not,
why? It seems that because it is "solid" at room temps
it would be quite easy to work with.
regards,
thom
Comment