Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New document

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New document

    > I can see by your answer you are completely close minded on the subject of LRL. You in fact are calling me liar,


    I think you took my post the wrong way. I did not mean to imply that either you or Jim is dishonest, but there may have been "discoveries" in the past that had a hidden agenda. I intended that to mean reported treasure discoveries, not the Quartzsite test. I believe you guys are discussing this right now with regards to the Electroscope. BTW, this can also be said of other discoveries, regardless of how they are found.


    > of course pretending you are the great scientist who needs some sort of special evidence. I have shared information with you and you dismiss it like only you know what the truth is. No matter what evidence I send you would not be enough or correct so I won't even try. The gold rings in the water is a good example. I actually interviewed this guy and understand what he was saying. But you simple dismiss this as unreliable and your analysis correct, of course.


    You're right, it would probably take more than just a few isolated success stories to change my opinion. Still, I would love to get copies of these stories to read over and keep in my archives.


    > You were not even in Quartzite but you know more about it than the people who were there. You are basing your judgment on what we told you.


    Right again, I'm basing it entirely on what I was told, and what I was told is that it was not properly conducted.


    > What if Jungle Jim and I were simply making the whole thing up? What if Jim did even better than we told you? Of course you would know. When a man won't treat me with any respect I cut off the relationship.


    I was trusting that what was told to me was done so with honesty and integrity. I still believe that to be true.


    > You won't have to answer this post as I won't read it anyway. You remind me of the naughty little boys I had in my classroom for so many years but I don't have to deal with them or you anymore. Go back to rediscovering the wheel while we find the goodies.-


    Sorry you feel that way Dan, but you asked me a question and I gave you my honest answer. Have fun with your LRL - that's what it's all about anyway, right?


    - Carl

  • #2
    Re: LRL Statement

    > I can see by your answer you are completely close minded on the subject of LRL. You in fact are calling me liar,


    I think you took my post the wrong way. I did not mean to imply that either you or Jim is dishonest, but there may have been "discoveries" in the past that had a hidden agenda. I intended that to mean reported treasure discoveries, not the Quartzsite test. I believe you guys are discussing this right now with regards to the Electroscope. BTW, this can also be said of other discoveries, regardless of how they are found.


    > of course pretending you are the great scientist who needs some sort of special evidence. I have shared information with you and you dismiss it like only you know what the truth is. No matter what evidence I send you would not be enough or correct so I won't even try. The gold rings in the water is a good example. I actually interviewed this guy and understand what he was saying. But you simple dismiss this as unreliable and your analysis correct, of course.


    You're right, it would probably take more than just a few isolated success stories to change my opinion. Still, I would love to get copies of these stories to read over and keep in my archives.


    > You were not even in Quartzite but you know more about it than the people who were there. You are basing your judgment on what we told you.


    Right again, I'm basing it entirely on what I was told, and what I was told is that it was not properly conducted.


    > What if Jungle Jim and I were simply making the whole thing up? What if Jim did even better than we told you? Of course you would know. When a man won't treat me with any respect I cut off the relationship.


    I was trusting that what was told to me was done so with honesty and integrity. I still believe that to be true.


    > You won't have to answer this post as I won't read it anyway. You remind me of the naughty little boys I had in my classroom for so many years but I don't have to deal with them or you anymore. Go back to rediscovering the wheel while we find the goodies.-


    Sorry you feel that way Dan, but you asked me a question and I gave you my honest answer. Have fun with your LRL - that's what it's all about anyway, right?


    - Carl

    Comment


    • #3
      Carl's bad manners

      Dan DeQuille


      You are right, Carl IS calling you a liar. Don't let it get you down though, he has called me a liar, he has called Legendary Lee a liar while he lies in his grave, he has called Dell Winders one of the great THers of our time a liar, Dowser 501 a liar, Al Osborn a liar, Richard Walburn, the list goes on and on. That's the thing about being super-smart. Any time they are wrong something happens to their ego and they tend to lash out instead of listening. Seems as though they can't believe someone knows something they don't know. Seems like more of a curse to me. On his introductory page to this site he says it is a place to discuss long range. Ha. What a joke. Only if you suffer from hero worship of that NUT-CASE James Randi can you mention any thing about long range and not be called a liar by the so-called host. I hear that the first step in self help is identifying the problem...perhaps we can help. Jungle Jim

      Comment


      • #4
        Carl's bad manners

        Dan DeQuille


        You are right, Carl IS calling you a liar. Don't let it get you down though, he has called me a liar, he has called Legendary Lee a liar while he lies in his grave, he has called Dell Winders one of the great THers of our time a liar, Dowser 501 a liar, Al Osborn a liar, Richard Walburn, the list goes on and on. That's the thing about being super-smart. Any time they are wrong something happens to their ego and they tend to lash out instead of listening. Seems as though they can't believe someone knows something they don't know. Seems like more of a curse to me. On his introductory page to this site he says it is a place to discuss long range. Ha. What a joke. Only if you suffer from hero worship of that NUT-CASE James Randi can you mention any thing about long range and not be called a liar by the so-called host. I hear that the first step in self help is identifying the problem...perhaps we can help. Jungle Jim

        Comment


        • #5
          New document

          Hi all,


          I've finally revised the document and spreadsheet. The revised


          versions are at:


          http://www.diamondjim.bc.ca/ppm.htm


          The revisions in the main document mainly deal with the low-noise


          amplifier. THe spreadsheethas had an error corrected -


          thecalculated inductance for a solenoidal sensor is now correct.


          I've written a new document giving complete construction details


          fand circuits or a digital PPM.


          Jim


          J.A. Koehler


          3290 N. Koehler Rd.


          Florence, AZ, 85232


          Ph: (520) 868-1156

          Comment

          Working...
          X