Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Increasing sensitivity of the GD-48

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The best is animy for better... I think even 2 ma economy from little battery is a result. The original circuit and modernized is not the same)))
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Gervm View Post
      The best is animy for better... I think even 2 ma economy from little battery is a result. The original circuit and modernized is not the same)))
      I can see the basic schematic, but the fine print text here, I cannot read any of it. Tried printing to full page size, nothing works, the fine text is not readable to me. Can you enlarge this schematic so I can read the fine print? Thanks.
      Melbeta

      Comment


      • #18
        Anybody know what this says
        thanks
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by 6666 View Post
          Anybody know what this says
          thanks
          Coils L1 and L2 turns and wire diameters for freq. 20 and 42 kHz

          Comment


          • #20
            It says in the first column:
            L1 has 31.6 cm diameter
            wound using wire 0.46 mm
            Number of turns for 42kHz is 16+5+5+16 turns
            Number of turns for 20kHz is 40+10+10+40 turns

            In the second column:
            L2 has 10.3 cm diameter
            wound using wire 0.27 mm
            Number of turns for 42kHz is 59+59 turns
            Number of turns for 20kHz is 136+136 turns

            Comment


            • #21
              Thanks Eddy and Davor

              Comment


              • #22
                Hi Gerum

                I have a question for you, which detector designed by Andy Flind you referring to?

                many thanks


                Blitzkrieg

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Gervm View Post
                  Interesting question... I have made more than 20 diferrent detectors. These were PI IB OR BFO and even one proton magnetometer. Some of them were enough modern and contained a lot of parts. But I`ve found that for me the best principle is IB. I say more. In field simple IB devices work good ... not worse than expensive and modern. My friends have modern brends and I can compare them in work.
                  So I prefer enough simple devices as Whites Classic 1 or more simple non momtion detectors. And I find things at the same place after my friends whith expensive md. In this case more important quality of head coils, quality of parts and quality of assembly. For example good maden old static device (author Flind) can detect side of my car at distance 3,5 meters! Try to do it with ACE. Simple detectors have less weight and they are very economical - one battery works very long .
                  Agree with you 100%.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X