Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can pinpointer detecting thin chain?
Collapse
X
-
Simulation shows 15kHz. IMHO it would be beneficial to go up with frequency. In that case you should consider going for pins 4 and 9 instead 5 and 11. Right now the sound is a bit irritatingly high, so maybe 4 and 6 would be ideal with elevated frequency.
I made it work in LTspice the way it behaves in real life, only I did not hit the sweet spot with the working point yet. I think the feedback could be cranked up a bit to promote the super regenerative behaviour, because it does look that way. That would explain a lot about the sensitivity.
I also discovered that emitter degeneration resistor is a far more responsive component to tweak the sweet spot. Maybe this design would benefit ftom some serious bias redesign, but don't worry, it will remain simple.
Yeah, this is interesting!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Davor View PostSimulation shows 15kHz. IMHO it would be beneficial to go up with frequency. In that case you should consider going for pins 4 and 9 instead 5 and 11. Right now the sound is a bit irritatingly high, so maybe 4 and 6 would be ideal with elevated frequency.
I made it work in LTspice the way it behaves in real life, only I did not hit the sweet spot with the working point yet. I think the feedback could be cranked up a bit to promote the super regenerative behaviour, because it does look that way. That would explain a lot about the sensitivity.
I also discovered that emitter degeneration resistor is a far more responsive component to tweak the sweet spot. Maybe this design would benefit ftom some serious bias redesign, but don't worry, it will remain simple.
Yeah, this is interesting!
It is a simple but effective circuit.
I am very fascinates how much improvement you can make.
I'm going to bed. Maybe I speak you tomorrow.
Comment
-
Designation Frequency Wavelength ELF extremely low frequency 3Hz to 30Hz 100'000km to 10'000 km SLF superlow frequency 30Hz to 300Hz 10'000km to 1'000km ULF ultralow frequency 300Hz to 3000Hz 1'000km to 100km VLF very low frequency 3kHz to 30kHz 100km to 10km LF low frequency 30kHz to 300kHz 10km to 1km MF medium frequency 300kHz to 3000kHz 1km to 100m HF high frequency 3MHz to 30MHz 100m to 10m VHF very high frequency 30MHz to 300MHz 10m to 1m UHF ultrahigh frequency 300MHz to 3000MHz 1m to 10cm SHF superhigh frequency 3GHz to 30GHz 10cm to 1cm EHF extremely high frequency 30GHz to 300GHz 1cm to 1mm However, to simplify things about VLF a good idea would be to use term audio frequency range. Imagine doing a project covering 20 Hz to 20 kHz, it would be annoying to write ELF/SLF/ULF/VLF all the time. But again it would not be correct if you just write VLF because there is much more in that range. Right? Instead, simply use term 'audio frequency range'. As I said in the beginning there are already dozens of articles with wrong frequency designations and a good thing would be to correct and minimize mistakes.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hadrianus View Post
and make your posts in English.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemelec View PostDesignation Frequency Wavelength ELF extremely low frequency 3Hz to 30Hz 100'000km to 10'000 km SLF superlow frequency 30Hz to 300Hz 10'000km to 1'000km ULF ultralow frequency 300Hz to 3000Hz 1'000km to 100km VLF very low frequency 3kHz to 30kHz 100km to 10km LF low frequency 30kHz to 300kHz 10km to 1km MF medium frequency 300kHz to 3000kHz 1km to 100m HF high frequency 3MHz to 30MHz 100m to 10m VHF very high frequency 30MHz to 300MHz 10m to 1m UHF ultrahigh frequency 300MHz to 3000MHz 1m to 10cm SHF superhigh frequency 3GHz to 30GHz 10cm to 1cm EHF extremely high frequency 30GHz to 300GHz 1cm to 1mm However, to simplify things about VLF a good idea would be to use term audio frequency range. Imagine doing a project covering 20 Hz to 20 kHz, it would be annoying to write ELF/SLF/ULF/VLF all the time. But again it would not be correct if you just write VLF because there is much more in that range. Right? Instead, simply use term 'audio frequency range'. As I said in the beginning there are already dozens of articles with wrong frequency designations and a good thing would be to correct and minimize mistakes.
How would you call it????
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nupi View PostData of the Pinpointer nupi.
Our Older Penny were Copper.
Our Newer Pennys are Copper Plated SOMETHING?
And NOW there are NO Pennies in Canada, DISCONTINUED.
Prior to 1967,Quarters and Dimes were Silver.
After that Older Quarters, Dimes and Nickels Were Nickel.
In Some Years they were Stainless Steel and other metals.
These Newer ones now are Only Heaven Knows metal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nupi View Post********** Rectification ********
The smallest chain link from the small chain of the video does not weigh 0.07 grams but only 0.007 grams. and detected at 0.5 centimeters.
However, "Harp", Asked me This for my Pinpointer.
Distance (mm) of detection for:
Aluminum foil of chocolate: 3x3mm, 2x2mm and 1x1mm
Copper wire 0.4mm diameter: 3mm, 2mm and 1mm Lengths. (26AWG)
I Didn't do the Aluminum foil as I don't have any of it from chocolate bars.
But I Did do those Copper Wires and posted my results in my article.
Nupi, How well will your Pin Pointer do on these TINY Pieces of Copper?
However, Calculating it out:
Based on Weight of 1000 feet of wire, 1mm of 26AWG wire weighs .000143 Grams
Comment
Comment