I like SMT because I can easily desolder chips and stuff.. I use ChipQuik desolder. When was the last time you've desoldered 14+ pin DIP chip with regular soldering iron?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TD3X ( pi )
Collapse
X
-
Monolith and Elipse, no argument there. I do a fair amount of work on old equipment so I am forced to remove dips. I usually just cut the leads and then suck the solder but this is a slow process. Hence the socket idea.
I have no issues with smt other than I have difficulties seeing the parts. There are lots of advantages and I guess I should work out some kind of magnifying workstation so I can do this easier. I have used stereo microscopes before and they are great. What do you guys use or is you vison good enough to see unaided?
Comment
-
Originally posted by eclipse View PostI like SMT because I can easily desolder chips and stuff.. I use ChipQuik desolder. When was the last time you've desoldered 14+ pin DIP chip with regular soldering iron?
Using this kind of solder makes soldering and de-soldering really easy.
I can't read without glasses. For PCB work I use a 5"x3 magnifier. SMD parts not smaller than 0805 size. I find it much easier to work with SMD than trough hole.
Comment
-
Monolith the desoldering kit I use has a low melting point of 80 degrees, which gives about 10-15 seconds to desolder a component.
Your solder paste is also good, perhaps a little more passes with the soldering iron to reheat the solder from all sides.
Less than 0805 have never touched. Way too small.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eclipse View PostAdditional parts might be needed for the oscillator part, what do you think?
[ATTACH]34594[/ATTACH]
I doubt that the "extra" work circuit that produces phase reversal.
Could work if the signal is taken from the emitter of the BC557, because in this case no investment ...
Jose
Comment
-
Originally posted by eclipse View PostAdditional parts might be needed for the oscillator part, what do you think?
[ATTACH]34594[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Don't mind this attachment where discharge is connected and not the output (I did that in a hurry and didn't double check to see it).
Next post I've corrected it - (View correct post)
I did a simulation of the output of 555 and the simulation showed that that the signal output is inverted
(instead of the FET being turned ON for 70-100uS it will be OFF) which if it's true will smoke out the Mosfet immediately.
The simulator is Multisim Blue 14.
Boards are ready & on the way!
Comment
Comment