Originally posted by ivconic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
felezjoo PI(the best pulse induction metal detector that I made until now)
Collapse
X
-
-
However, it must be documented what it exactly means.
Seen from the used parts the coil has the highest potential for changing values.
If 300 represents the best coil inductivity and the shown value is pretty close,
you could be shure that the selfbuilt coil has the best performance.
But it also could represents voltage-stability or EM-field shielding of the PCB.
That's why it would be good if everyone knows for what those values stand.
Comment
-
This project is dead now! No one is still interested to it for the reason of annoing reprogramming the chip..i think it only get alive back when there is a full version on hex.. I keep on looking to other forum but i notice that all builder are longing for full version and many has difficulties in making it work as expected. Even me myself made this machine work impressly will not introduce to other hobbyst to try building it.
Comment
-
I guess this protection is pretty simple to crack but I don't care about it.
For me this is more like a stupid joke here with this 300 times restriction!
And an offense against the tinkering community!
On the other hand of course it's better than to have nothing!
I would only built such a thing for having an interesting "reverse-engineering-challenge"... !
Otherwise I would see it as you said jladre, as a frustrating project and a waste of time
and I rather would concentrate myself directly on fully functional detectors.
Some years ago every single sat pay-tv channel of Europe was open.
By self-programmed smardcards, patched CAM-modules and special receiver-firmware.
I don't know how cheap you can get the needed IC but you may buy directly a dozen of
them, program them all and use some IC-socket to avoid the stupid firmware-recovery.
This way you also can sell those detectors to people who are not technical experts.
All they have to do is pulling the "finished" chip out of the socket and put in some "full" one!
It's like reloading the ammu.
Comment
-
"...as a frustrating project and a waste of time..."
You don't know how wrong you are!
This is by far best PI i ever made.
Beats the crap out of every PI that i have made so far.
But it's delicate to make it right, exactly as noted several times by author.
Comment
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efbovm6QomM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SKL71vlFRM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELOvaOW7SDo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXUhUCe2if8
I have made only 2 devices so far, one for me and one for my good friend.
I intend to make few more in the future.
Videos i am posting above are not prepared for exact Youtube demonstrations, those are just my "working" videos which i made in process of experimenting.
But right now i don't have better videos, so those will hopefully be illustrative enough.
Yes; it is having discrimination! And it is not worse nor better than what we can see on other discriminative PI detectors on market today (except maybe few top notched models made by ML).
Front panel is made for another type of PI which i am making recently , but i used those because i have no time to make new ones; that's the reason for label "Vesta".
(Vesta (Latin pronunciation: [ˈwɛsta]) is the virgin goddess of the hearth, home, and family in Roman religion)
Comment
-
Originally posted by dragomir View PostOnly I did not understand a large antenna if anyone is pleased with the work and depth?
I made only 38cm round coil, as seen on videos.
Depths... tough to be precise.
Coins up to 40cm. Larger objects up to 150cm.
All depends on adjustments and setups.
I took it outdoor only once so far, in my backyard, for skim testings.
As i said; it beats the crap out on preliminary testings.
Comment
Comment