If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I went down the GS5 path a few years ago , but abandoned it due to unproven or unconfirmable information .
What are your design expectations for this detector ?.
Carl has made you a great offer, if you can get your signal past the documented GS5 preamp you could be on a winner,
Dave, do you work with micros? The GS5 used a 555 + discrete logic clocking whereas the TDI used a micro which makes all the clocking and frequency control easier. The code I wrote for the PI3 in ITMD is probably not far from what is needed to replicate this function.
The GS5 and original TDI used an AD654 V-to-F chip to create the hi-lo tones through separate amp paths. In the TDI-SL I replaced the pricey '654 with a simple 555 that exactly replicated the tones. It would take me a lot of thinking to re-figure out how I did that, my suggestion instead is to slap on a simple 555 VCO just to get the thing to run. You can make something better later.
Dave, do you work with micros? The GS5 used a 555 + discrete logic clocking whereas the TDI used a micro which makes all the clocking and frequency control easier. The code I wrote for the PI3 in ITMD is probably not far from what is needed to replicate this function.
The GS5 and original TDI used an AD654 V-to-F chip to create the hi-lo tones through separate amp paths. In the TDI-SL I replaced the pricey '654 with a simple 555 that exactly replicated the tones. It would take me a lot of thinking to re-figure out how I did that, my suggestion instead is to slap on a simple 555 VCO just to get the thing to run. You can make something better later.
Hi Carl...Unfortunately i cannot do programming....many years ago i did try and learn pic programming but it got too heavy for my mind and i gave up...as you say a simple 555 vco will do the trick for now...i like a challenge and the gs 5 will be a good project.
Can someone explain me how discrimination is working on this detector? Is ferrous/non ferrous or low conductive/ high conductive target.
not ferrous not non ferrous not low high conductive. NOTHING. NO DISC like you have in a VLF.
it was done ONLY (SIC!!!!) for small gold nuggets, 0.5...1... 2 gramm... very specific detector especially done for australian conds and some regions of US gold fields. for beach maybe if you want find very tiny chains.
i dont understand why people so want the spec detector if they do not have gold sand around.
hi kt...i thought gs 5 can reject some iron in ground cancell mode...i think the iron has to be in a horizontal position to be rejected...but in ground/disc mode you loose some depth from what i understand.
Can someone explain me how discrimination is working on this detector? Is ferrous/non ferrous or low conductive/ high conductive target.
The discrimination on the GS5 is definitely not ferrous/non-ferrous. It's the same as the TDI, which purloins the ground balance function to give a different audio tone for targets either above or below a particular setting. http://www.detectorprospector.com/go...n-settings.htm
Comment