If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
yup. Eric Foster works hard to do PI working in high mineralized conditions. thats problem.
[ATTACH]47313[/ATTACH]
Problem solved in 2012 with Goldscan 6. High power TX with Fan cooling, 24", or larger, coils which can be differential for noise cancelling. Waist or trolley mounting, GB that works in Australia which has much stronger mineralisation than anywhere else. Not a DIY project but have one for sale for GBP5000 (freight extra) with 24" mono coil and shaft. The one possible DIY bit is to make your own trolley with no metal parts.
VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
not your mind application.
VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both.
Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.
Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect.
Addendum:
I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.
Problem solved in 2012 with Goldscan 6. High power TX with Fan cooling, 24", or larger, coils which can be differential for noise cancelling. Waist or trolley mounting, GB that works in Australia which has much stronger mineralisation than anywhere else. Not a DIY project but have one for sale for GBP5000 (freight extra) with 24" mono coil and shaft. The one possible DIY bit is to make your own trolley with no metal parts.
VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
not your mind application.
I agree with you..i have a basic knowledge in electronics and knows a little bit about programming..but i am not an expert..just trying to build a simple one just to detect an object as big as the AVR in minimum depth of 2meters..
Actually i contacted rams n phil.he is from here and i think his product suits for our needs but he doesnt reply this few days Just wanna buy one of his product. But i think his too busy building his new project that he would recommend it to me aside from his old products..
Hopefully i can build my MD. Either PI or VLF with the minimum depth of 2meters with the help of you and the other admins and gurus here..
Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.
Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect..
Uhh..i see..so i'd better built a VLF rather than PI if the soil is viscous. But history in our place have their own differences,some that get AU bars in a shallow depth around 3feet upto 6feet the soil is backfill and have been touched already..some are viscous and compact like in the creek side and the side walls of the falls
Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.
Addendum:
I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.
Ow? Its not just a rumors. You can watch lost gold of world war 2 in youtube..they posted their last video about 3 or 4 months ago and i think they already get what they are looking for i think under ther falls there is a secret tunnel..
That is the fact. my friend also found a 700pieces platinum bars at 188feet which each bars weighs around 9kilos each.. he just use accumeter pro II. That is why im also looking for the schematic of accumeter pro II..i already built the accumeter pro VI i guess? Given by you..the result is good ..but compared to accumeter pro II,it think needs a MOD..
VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
not your mind application.
I think you're right. I would build this two. VLF and PI. What peoject would you recommend? I will also use it in three of our treasure sites here. One is japanese tunnel with chambers. Also in the middle of two creek.one creek is man made. there is an isle we dig it up. And a cemented box like a coffin under water soon to be explored.within this months. if you can provide me some of the diagram and layout,i wont forget the person who helped me i assure you.. any person who can help me will have its reward also whenever the operation is successful..
Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.
Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect.
Addendum:
I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.
Anyway,i think you know bob fitzgerald? He uses whites tm808 and he got what he is looking for 75kg AU bar i guess? We have lots of sites here..more than 30+ sites..just only in our province..
Greetings from the stable main land and I hope you have found some treasure-island.
The first question is:
How large is the search area? Because if you walk very carefully at some small 10x10 meter place
your chances are much better, even with higher mineralization.
Especially if you remove all the junk first.
Comment