Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HELLO CARL :) recommendation please?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by kt315 View Post
    yup. Eric Foster works hard to do PI working in high mineralized conditions. thats problem.

    [ATTACH]47313[/ATTACH]
    Problem solved in 2012 with Goldscan 6. High power TX with Fan cooling, 24", or larger, coils which can be differential for noise cancelling. Waist or trolley mounting, GB that works in Australia which has much stronger mineralisation than anywhere else. Not a DIY project but have one for sale for GBP5000 (freight extra) with 24" mono coil and shaft. The one possible DIY bit is to make your own trolley with no metal parts.

    Eric.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1030253.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	172.2 KB
ID:	354829 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1030262.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	213.3 KB
ID:	354830 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040247.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	352.6 KB
ID:	354831 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040258.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	455.1 KB
ID:	354832

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Bhathu saaii View Post
      Gold bars ������ or any other possible metal..

      For 6666


      There you go Eric has the machine for you, paid for with one gold bar

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Bhathu saaii View Post
        Is VLF good in highly mineralized soil?
        VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
        control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
        try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
        not your mind application.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by kt315 View Post
          VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both.
          Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.

          Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect.

          Addendum:

          I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Ferric Toes View Post
            Problem solved in 2012 with Goldscan 6. High power TX with Fan cooling, 24", or larger, coils which can be differential for noise cancelling. Waist or trolley mounting, GB that works in Australia which has much stronger mineralisation than anywhere else. Not a DIY project but have one for sale for GBP5000 (freight extra) with 24" mono coil and shaft. The one possible DIY bit is to make your own trolley with no metal parts.

            Eric.

            [ATTACH]47327[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]47328[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]47329[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]47330[/ATTACH]
            Wow..this MD is so nice..but i think its very expensive and i cant afford it at this moment..maybe sooner or later ������ how much is this GBP5000?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by 6666 View Post
              There you go Eric has the machine for you, paid for with one gold bar
              Hopefully we will success for our adventure here in the philippines �� there are lots of AU bars here. Also PT.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by kt315 View Post
                VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
                control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
                try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
                not your mind application.
                I agree with you..i have a basic knowledge in electronics and knows a little bit about programming..but i am not an expert..just trying to build a simple one just to detect an object as big as the AVR in minimum depth of 2meters..

                Actually i contacted rams n phil.he is from here and i think his product suits for our needs but he doesnt reply this few days Just wanna buy one of his product. But i think his too busy building his new project that he would recommend it to me aside from his old products..

                Hopefully i can build my MD. Either PI or VLF with the minimum depth of 2meters with the help of you and the other admins and gurus here..

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                  Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.

                  Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect..
                  Uhh..i see..so i'd better built a VLF rather than PI if the soil is viscous. But history in our place have their own differences,some that get AU bars in a shallow depth around 3feet upto 6feet the soil is backfill and have been touched already..some are viscous and compact like in the creek side and the side walls of the falls

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                    Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.


                    Addendum:

                    I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.
                    Ow? Its not just a rumors. You can watch lost gold of world war 2 in youtube..they posted their last video about 3 or 4 months ago and i think they already get what they are looking for i think under ther falls there is a secret tunnel..

                    That is the fact. my friend also found a 700pieces platinum bars at 188feet which each bars weighs around 9kilos each.. he just use accumeter pro II. That is why im also looking for the schematic of accumeter pro II..i already built the accumeter pro VI i guess? Given by you..the result is good ..but compared to accumeter pro II,it think needs a MOD..

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by kt315 View Post
                      VLF or PI is not difference be cause the physics is same in both. ONE NATURE we say. PI has more TX current in coil, sometimes you can
                      control it. for example Delta Pulse has 150-500us PULSE WIDTH controlled. VLF is working with low TX current.
                      try both and get first result. compare them. another way to read ITMD book, but maybe you prefer to waste a money on cigarettes and a knowledge is
                      not your mind application.
                      I think you're right. I would build this two. VLF and PI. What peoject would you recommend? I will also use it in three of our treasure sites here. One is japanese tunnel with chambers. Also in the middle of two creek.one creek is man made. there is an isle we dig it up. And a cemented box like a coffin under water soon to be explored.within this months. if you can provide me some of the diagram and layout,i wont forget the person who helped me i assure you.. any person who can help me will have its reward also whenever the operation is successful..

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                        Not apples and apples. PI doesn't see reactive signals so if the ground is largely non-viscous then PI will work better. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.

                        Bhathu, you can try one of the PI projects floating around here, and generally with a 2ft coil it is possible to detect large items to 2m. "It is possible" depends on adjusting the timing parameters of the detector to get the needed performance. And that means understanding what you are doing. If you don't understand how it all works, then you probably will not succeed. And I cannot give you all the answers because I don't know anything about your soil or what you are trying to detect.

                        Addendum:

                        I would consider Eric's Goldscan 6 a bargain for what you are trying to achieve, except that I generally dismiss all the fantasy rumors of Yamash?ta gold in the Philippines. But, for anyone wanting to find the next "Hand of Faith," the GS6 is the detector that could find it.
                        Anyway,i think you know bob fitzgerald? He uses whites tm808 and he got what he is looking for 75kg AU bar i guess? We have lots of sites here..more than 30+ sites..just only in our province..

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Bhathu saaii View Post
                          Uhh..i see..so i'd better built a VLF rather than PI if the soil is viscous.
                          Umm, that's not at all what I suggested. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Bhathu saaii View Post
                            That is the fact. my friend also found a 700pieces platinum bars at 188feet which each bars weighs around 9kilos each..
                            Did he dig up the bars and hold them in his hand?

                            Originally posted by Bhathu saaii View Post
                            Anyway,i think you know bob fitzgerald? He uses whites tm808 and he got what he is looking for 75kg AU bar i guess?
                            Bob sells dreams. I've never known him to actually find anything.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Hi Bhathu saaii

                              Greetings from the stable main land and I hope you have found some treasure-island.

                              The first question is:
                              How large is the search area? Because if you walk very carefully at some small 10x10 meter place
                              your chances are much better, even with higher mineralization.
                              Especially if you remove all the junk first.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                                Umm, that's not at all what I suggested. If the ground is viscous then a ground-cancel PI is needed and even then it will work better than VLF.
                                Uhh..now i get it thank you so much bro..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X