Where to connect the shield....?
Hi Ivconic, PulseStarIIUser
“…Where to connect the shield….” It’s a very good question. I would not connect any shield in any design direct to "digital" ground. By the way the Delta Pulse does not have a digital ground. The Delta Pulse has a "virtual analogue ground" generated by IC D6A to operate the OPAMP’s.
I looked at some other circuits like Whites PI 2000-3000 schematic or DBP2010. The Whites PI has the shield connected to "minus" pole of the battery. The DBP2010 has it connected to the "plus" pole. That’s the opposite!
Here my conclusion:
I would connect the shield at the nearest “power point” (electrical path) to the battery that is “seen by the coil”. This can be the “minus” or the “plus” pole of the battery, depending on your design.
Take a look at the White PI 2000-3000 schematic. Here is one side of the coil connected direct to the “minus” pole. The designer connected the shield to the “minus” pole of the battery too.
In the DBP2010 schematic is the coil direct connected to the “plus” pole of the battery and as you can see the shield (see big loop option; Elektor book, page 16
is connected to the “plus” pole as well.
In the Delta Pulse schematic is the coil direct connected to the “plus” pole (E+) of the battery. My conclusion is that I would connect the shield to the “plus” pole, because the plus pole is the nearest power point, seen by the coil.
So, Ivconic is right if he connects the shield to the plus pole in his Delta Pulse.
Any comments / critics are well come….
Chris
Hi Ivconic, PulseStarIIUser
“…Where to connect the shield….” It’s a very good question. I would not connect any shield in any design direct to "digital" ground. By the way the Delta Pulse does not have a digital ground. The Delta Pulse has a "virtual analogue ground" generated by IC D6A to operate the OPAMP’s.
I looked at some other circuits like Whites PI 2000-3000 schematic or DBP2010. The Whites PI has the shield connected to "minus" pole of the battery. The DBP2010 has it connected to the "plus" pole. That’s the opposite!
Here my conclusion:
I would connect the shield at the nearest “power point” (electrical path) to the battery that is “seen by the coil”. This can be the “minus” or the “plus” pole of the battery, depending on your design.
Take a look at the White PI 2000-3000 schematic. Here is one side of the coil connected direct to the “minus” pole. The designer connected the shield to the “minus” pole of the battery too.
In the DBP2010 schematic is the coil direct connected to the “plus” pole of the battery and as you can see the shield (see big loop option; Elektor book, page 16

In the Delta Pulse schematic is the coil direct connected to the “plus” pole (E+) of the battery. My conclusion is that I would connect the shield to the “plus” pole, because the plus pole is the nearest power point, seen by the coil.
So, Ivconic is right if he connects the shield to the plus pole in his Delta Pulse.
Any comments / critics are well come….
Chris
Comment