Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Delta Pulse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DP vs PS


    Hi Geo!
    I did not try any other number of windings. It was a wild guess with 18 turns and it
    worked satisfactory. I am not sure that it is analog to count no.of turns by diammeter of
    coil. It must be some other factor for calculating number of turns. I noticed that it is
    not the rule,since i made over 50 diff. coils for PI's in last years. For large coils it is
    usually from 14 to 20 turns, but again it is not a rule, i am not sure 100%.
    All depends of wire gauge and current also of freq. too. I am not quite competent to explain
    that proper.75 cm coil is detecting 2 cm coin from 25-28cm distance....poor! But i made
    large coil with idea only to detect larger object in higher depths. The dumper resistor is
    1 k and it will stay as it is in all my experiments. The frequency is adjusted to 398 Hz and
    i did not adjusted it any more. From time to time i test it with freq. meter just to be sure
    that oscil. is working stabile with no drifts. And it is working very stabile.
    The inductance tell's me not to much. I am used to experiment "in vivo". Why? Simply,i noticed
    many times that theory "drifts" from real life. Theory is just very important starting point, but
    final results you'll get only by "sweat". Why is that so? Well, i am here in my place using my
    components(condensers,resistors,spare parts...etc) and respecting schematic, at the end i gain
    some results, you in your place using your components respecting the same schematic gain quite
    different results !? There is a lot of differences in the material we used, in Cul wire....in
    instruments we are using to measure...etc.etc.. Even from the same manufacturer you can find
    the same type of component but with quite different performances.That's why i do respect theory but
    mostly rely on my own experience. 75cm coil worked nice from the begining and i am satisfied with
    it. I already wraped it in plastic and glued it hard.It is difficult for me now to bargain about
    more or less windings. If i find some more of "hoola hop"-s i can experiment further.In that case
    i'll report here to you the results. 42cm coil did not worked from the first try. I made 3-4 coils
    on 42 cm holder and all worked very poor, cose i respected theory about less windings. At the end
    i left that theory and put 35 windings on it and it is working good now. It might work even better
    but right now i am tired of making any more large coils. Next step is to make a small coil, only for
    coins. I am planing to use some 20cm former and wound from 24 to 45 windings, wire from 0.2 to 0.5mm
    and test it.When i gain result that it can detect 2cm coin over 30cm i'll stop.It will be enough
    for my needs.I think it is possible, what do you think?
    I have read almost all from Eric Foster's works, from the others too. I learned much from them.
    It is very,very good starting point to understand main principles of PI detectors. But the best
    results i gained yet from my own experimenting.It was not big difference from what that people
    claimed, but it were some minor "drifts", by reasons i mentioned above...(working conditions,
    material, measuring instruments...etc.)
    SO far i made a few PI's. Some "toys" and this very good Delta Pulse. When i compare it with
    Pulsestar II i can tell you one thing: in some cases it is working much better than PulsestarII !!!
    Also i noticed that Pulsestar II and Delta PUlse, both are less sensitive on Cu than other materials.
    Why is that so!? Pulsestar II is very sensitive on ground conditions,Delta Pulse is not!
    Pilsestar II is very sensitive on that "silver" Al paper from cigarettes and chocolate wrapped in,
    Delta Pulse is not !? But it is very sensitive on some Al object, also on Ag object too!
    For example, delta pulse can detect Ag knife over 40cm, Pilsestar II over 45cm...
    The main advantage for Delta pulse, for me, is that i can further affect on it by extra adjustments
    and further improvements, on Pulsestar II i can not! It is very expensive toy, and those two PIC's
    are protected, so any further "playing" with it can bust it.Also it has smt pcb, sprayed with
    some resin, and it will be high risky to try to solder something more on it.
    If Delta Pulse show simillar results on the field than i guess PulsestarII will be on sale, very
    soon!!!
    O.K. Geo that was all for now. If you have time, you may post some coil specifications you made
    it and some extra test too.
    Keep in touch..
    Best regards!!!

    Comment


    • Hi Ivconic.
      I calculated the inductance with Gary's formula. BUT i agree that the better calculating is the experiment. If the 75 cm coil detects a 2 cm coin at 25 cm then i believe that is a very good coil.When i will have time i will try one. Yesterday i made a 10 in coil with 0.5mm and 38 turns but i had not the time to try it. Maybe today or tommorow . if not then the other week because i will travel until ALBANIA for 5 days (not for treasure hunting ha..ha).When i will have results i will write you.
      Best Regards

      Comment


      • o.k.


        What are you gonna do there ???
        Today i wound 30 wind. on 20 cm , o.4mm wire...Well, i am not thrill with it
        but it can detect 2cm coin on 28-29cm...almost done.What to say?
        What ever result i get, always want some more..I keep thinking is it possible
        to do 20cm coil to detect 2 cm coin over 35cm!? Only one detector i saw can
        do that...Relic Hawk...coin is made from mixture of Cu and brass...Hard to test
        with! O.K. when you try it please post results here.
        Regards

        Comment


        • hi geo and ivconic, one question for yours, is free the delta pulse of problems reject of ground?
          or this artefact have problem, say me , what disadvanyages have the delta pulse? because is it is perhaps the delta superior to one efficient and simple circuit two boxes? because this types of machine are preferred to the two box, prefered to one versatile and simple function of two boxes operation ? I have the news of detector of two boxes that is not affected by the effect of desbalance of earth, waves or lines, this deep too 3 meters in soil , have delta pulse problems whit statics or waves of city, what advantages have these detector? what is the applications in detection of delta? only for he is single to be used to the outside in mounts, to opened field, or it is possible to be used in congested cities and floods of señales?agradecere but information about the delta, I it truth do not go to build these big complexity,of ics and circuit, prefer to construct simple two boxes that have sufficient advantages and that is not influenced by papers of single aluminum and detect only big masses, I appreciate its attention we are platicando kindly detectoman thanks

          Comment


          • en español:
            hola hermano geo y ivconic expertos en la construccion, jejeejje y no es ironia, en verdad se que animo y inteligencia le ponen a estas complejidades , y los felicito a ustedes y a todos los del foro, ok el comentario es este:

            yo no entiendo porque los detectores de dos cajas estan siendo relegados,o casi obsoletos, si sabemos que por ejemplo un delta pulse conlleva mucho trabajo y complejidad para su construccion, y vemos, que el circuito del delta pulse esta lleno de circuitos integrados, y precisa de mediciones con osciloscopios ,puestas a punto, mucha minuciosidad, y un dos caja logra lo mismo con solo un simple ic y tres transistores y dos bobinas, un delta por ejemplo es mas dificil de transportarse, es mas delicado en sus piezas, y un dos cajas se transporta y guarda rapidamente y transporta, en forma de maleta, yo mismo he costruido un detector dos cajas sin tener mucho conocimiento de electronica , lo hice sin circuito impreso , solo con una tableta perforada comercial, este detector dos cajas, funciona igual casi en cualquier tipo de terreno, precisa solo de dos baterias 9 volts, se le pueden hacer muchas modificaciones, las baterias acidas con las que lo manejo de las cuales casi no las consume, etc, asi que agradecere que por favor me digan ustedes que tienen mas experiencia en deteccion, el porque de su preferencia de un pi a uno de dos cajas sencillamente mas economico, y mas resistente
            ok estamos platicando
            les mando saludos y les reconozco sus trabajos, y su experiencia
            desde mexico detectoman

            Comment


            • my commentaries were because you estan constructing great coils, although if I recognize the util use that gives a detector of subject of gossip for the search of small and valuable pieces, agradecere say to me if the delta presses is discriminating, thanks detectoman
              mis comentarios fueron porque ustedes estan constuyendo grandes bobinas, para profundidad , en el uso de un detector de platillo, aunque si reconozco, la utilidad de un detector de plato, para piezas pequeñas, o valiosas, la verdad no conozco mucho acerca del delta pulse, les agradecere me digan si ese detector discrimina o si maneja varias frecuencias o tambien me digan las ventajas y desventajas del delta pulse, les mando un saludo y hasta pronto
              aparatorista, detectorista detectoman

              Comment


              • Sorry...


                Sorry, Detectoman, I am not English, I am Serbian....My english is poor, so it
                is almost imposiblle for me to understand what have you been written here?
                If is there any chance for you to rewrite this in some understandable manner, than i'll be glad to reply to you..
                regards

                Comment


                • Detectoman ask why you persist in this complicate circuit wich requires many adjustments, etc., and relegates the two boxes, wich give, if not more sensitivity, equal than PI... with few adjustments.

                  Also Detectoman said that He appreciate your finest work and also ask why your preference for PI and no for two boxes. Also ask if the Delta Pulse or similar PI can discriminate.

                  Calm!!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by detectoman
                    hi geo and ivconic, one question for yours, is free the delta pulse of problems reject of ground?
                    or this artefact have problem, say me , what disadvanyages have the delta pulse? because is it is perhaps the delta superior to one efficient and simple circuit two boxes? because this types of machine are preferred to the two box, prefered to one versatile and simple function of two boxes operation ? I have the news of detector of two boxes that is not affected by the effect of desbalance of earth, waves or lines, this deep too 3 meters in soil , have delta pulse problems whit statics or waves of city, what advantages have these detector? what is the applications in detection of delta? only for he is single to be used to the outside in mounts, to opened field, or it is possible to be used in congested cities and floods of señales?agradecere but information about the delta, I it truth do not go to build these big complexity,of ics and circuit, prefer to construct simple two boxes that have sufficient advantages and that is not influenced by papers of single aluminum and detect only big masses, I appreciate its attention we are platicando kindly detectoman thanks
                    Hi detectoman.
                    Two boxes detectors are not so sensitive as PI with large coil. Two boxes are sensitive at large objects and ideal at anomalies grounds (with big stones). Delta Pulse as other P.I detectors can not discriminate but have the ability to reject some small iron objects and ceramics by adjusting the sample delay.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ivconic

                      What are you gonna do there ???
                      Today i wound 30 wind. on 20 cm , o.4mm wire...Well, i am not thrill with it
                      but it can detect 2cm coin on 28-29cm...almost done.What to say?
                      What ever result i get, always want some more..I keep thinking is it possible
                      to do 20cm coil to detect 2 cm coin over 35cm!? Only one detector i saw can
                      do that...Relic Hawk...coin is made from mixture of Cu and brass...Hard to test
                      with! O.K. when you try it please post results here.
                      Regards
                      Hi ivconic.
                      Today i leave for Albania for recreation. Next week i will come back and i will test the coil. i believe that for coin detecting 25..30 cm coils are most suitable.
                      If you can detect a 2 cm coin at 30..32 cm it is very good.
                      Btw bbsailor made XR71 and made tests with coils (with shield or not). If he read this maybe can tell us about his results.
                      Best Regards

                      Comment


                      • hi my friends
                        ´thanks esteban for your traductions to geo and ivconic of my commentaries
                        is true, sometimes is necesary one detector how delta pulse, for detection of small and big objets in special conditions , or in city examinations, also the great coils is not versatile for travel, is very busy the transportations or in equipment in groups o travel mountain , these big coils in not custom for detectorist man, the solution i think is one two box, size or rod adjustable dimensions, large o short, two boxs accomplise in one box of simple transportation, is very versatile , is not affected for ground of mineralization, one question on delta pulse, : ? if this is stable o affected for heat of sun in stabilized circuit of cap, and ics, or is unstable or affect for electrifications of radiation of machines electrics how refrigerators, tvs, etc resgards detectoman mexico

                        Comment


                        • Oh dear !!!


                          It was not intentionally to promote PI detector at all !
                          By coincidence i choose PI to make again after some years.
                          I have nothing against 2 boxes. I intend to make 2 box in future for sure.
                          I would like to make copy of TM 808, but pcb is buging me. Geo suggest me
                          "light" project like Bucaneer, but i would like TM 808 anyway. I am to lazy to
                          draw pcb, so i am waiting to find some easy pcb for it on the .net ....
                          Other 2 box projects on the .net does not look enough interesting to me...
                          Best regards!
                          Geo, i wish you nice trip....when you return we will continue this saga...

                          Comment


                          • one more thing...


                            I forget to mention....ivconic asks me to reply here in his words...he is on the field right now, deep in the mountain...he called me by VHF and ask what's new on the forum,later asks me to reply here....Just for note we are neighbours here, many of project done togather..
                            regards !!!

                            Comment


                            • Howdy...

                              Me,Ivconic and Strujas on the field eith Pulsestar II....
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • help to me

                                hi to all
                                a want building delta pulse. please send for me pcb .part list . schematic and....
                                can delta pulse breakup between metals?????????????
                                wait for yo . good by

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X