Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SBG-PID

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • You have mistakes. I have not checked everything, I do not have time.Click image for larger version

Name:	error.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	183.3 KB
ID:	353868

    Comment


    • Originally posted by scs View Post
      The resistors R43 and R51 are selected according to the meter
      That's why I put a trimmer there, as I wrote in a post.

      Originally posted by wallker View Post
      Only the two resistors R43 and R51 are changed with trimmer, rest is original.
      There was indeed error at c11 and c12, it's just hard to read your sch. (red is how I would done it, black circle is how you done it) Click image for larger version

Name:	sbg.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	26.9 KB
ID:	353869
      Anyway tnx you for noticing, I've changed that now.
      I'm looking forward to eliminate all the errors that exists on schematic.
      Version with corrected caps: SBG-PID.pdf
      Last edited by wallker; 04-23-2019, 10:45 AM. Reason: attached correct pdf file.

      Comment


      • Walker what did you draw that in, it was fast.

        Comment


        • Hi 6666,
          I drew it in altium designer.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by wallker View Post
            Hi 6666,
            I drew it in altium designer.

            Comment


            • lf357 is obsolet, why did all engineers here continue drawing design with lf357
              i got a handful of fake lf357 from ali, just for testing - but they are crap

              Comment


              • And the darlington transistor is old.. .Aber arbeitet sehr gut!

                Comment


                • http://www.allxref.com/search.htm?part=LF357

                  http://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers/f/14/t/84056#

                  Comment


                  • Always hate to see such awkward way of drawing schematics.
                    Purposely messed up to the level of being completely confusing.
                    Also kind a looking more "profound" than actually it is.
                    Now, once you put it on "paper" on right way; everything evolves nicely.
                    ...
                    As for the design; it's alright. Simple enough and yet offering some features which other simple pi designs are lacking.
                    It is a step forward comparing to other simple PI designs available on this forum. Not just "another pi...".
                    I hate to see the analog meter scale there.
                    Was it so hard that voltage to fed to thrs. input of cmos vco and get two-tone behavior?
                    7555s are cheap, why not using even two vco's? And get two nice trimmed and pleasant tones.
                    Just an idea.
                    Timings... 4538, also hate to see them too. Atmega can replace them with no sweat at all.
                    Etc etc...
                    Things can be lifted on much higher lever here.
                    It is good starting point though.
                    I had enough "fun" time to redraw schematic as i like to see it.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	S_BG_PI.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	427.6 KB
ID:	353878

                    Comment


                    • Thanks Ivconic , very quick drawing

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bernte_one View Post
                        lf357 is obsolet, why did all engineers here continue drawing design with lf357
                        i got a handful of fake lf357 from ali, just for testing - but they are crap
                        I got a bunch of fakes to

                        Comment


                        • Of course; looking at such terrifically awkward drawings: you can generate only more mistakes in redraw.
                          So i spotted one i made at ps part.
                          Here is corrected:

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	S_BG_PI.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	358.7 KB
ID:	353879

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ivconic View Post
                            Always hate to see such awkward way of drawing schematics.
                            Purposely messed up to the level of being completely confusing.
                            Also kind a looking more "profound" than actually it is.
                            Now, once you put it on "paper" on right way; everything evolves nicely.
                            ...
                            As for the design; it's alright. Simple enough and yet offering some features which other simple pi designs are lacking.
                            It is a step forward comparing to other simple PI designs available on this forum. Not just "another pi...".
                            I hate to see the analog meter scale there.
                            Was it so hard that voltage to fed to thrs. input of cmos vco and get two-tone behavior?
                            7555s are cheap, why not using even two vco's? And get two nice trimmed and pleasant tones.
                            Just an idea.
                            Timings... 4538, also hate to see them too. Atmega can replace them with no sweat at all.
                            Etc etc...
                            Things can be lifted on much higher lever here.
                            It is good starting point though.
                            I had enough "fun" time to redraw schematic as i like to see it.

                            [ATTACH]46083[/ATTACH]
                            Much nicer and easier to follow drawing.

                            Yes, there is much of the design that could have been upgraded. Any small processor easily does all the timing and allows easy experimentation and even several modes in the field.

                            VCO output is a must if having low/high conductor discrimination. There can be a lot of audio information this way.
                            Lots of simple methods for VCO.
                            A meter is handy to check strength of signal, target size/depth. I added a meter to my HH2 and is handy at times.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by waltr View Post
                              Much nicer and easier to follow drawing.

                              Yes, there is much of the design that could have been upgraded. Any small processor easily does all the timing and allows easy experimentation and even several modes in the field.

                              VCO output is a must if having low/high conductor discrimination. There can be a lot of audio information this way.
                              Lots of simple methods for VCO.
                              A meter is handy to check strength of signal, target size/depth. I added a meter to my HH2 and is handy at times.

                              Use of Atmega and LCD will allow tossing 40-60% of present schematic out.
                              But first it would be good to make it as it is and see the behavior.
                              Later on, step by step to replace some parts with code in Atmega.
                              I might do that when i nick some spare time. Will see.

                              Comment


                              • I noticed error a transistor VT9 is connected back. Please for excuse.Click image for larger version

Name:	SBG-PID-CORR.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	603.3 KB
ID:	353880

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X