Originally posted by eduardo1979
View Post
It will need another pcb, since too many changes comparing to the pcb i have now on the bench.
It is important to keep in mind that the final goal is not just ordinary non-motion, but a much more complex device that is based on the non-motion principle.
Honestly, I don't even know where this will take me. While working on this; it can happen that I abruptly change part of the plan and decide on something else.
That's why I started very slowly and with very simple parts, so that I could easily remake only the details.
It would be really good to have a video of how it works, what you suggested.
As I mentioned earlier; currently as things stand: there are a couple of things that need to be radically changed. Coil, negative voltage generation and audio.
But for now, I'm focused only on channels and solving drift. Your suggestion is interesting but requires a new pcb.
The problem with me is that my pcbs are made by someone else, from another place, who often procrastinates.
It often happens that when my pcb arrives after a long delay; I forget what I really wanted with that pcb!
Looking at such pcb confused and trying to figure out what it's about? Big problem when you don't get the pcb on time.
So for now, I only have the conditions to try Carl's suggestion. To somehow tie another 4066 and test the behavior in practice.
In any case, it is an interesting proposal. It would be good you to make a pcb and record a video of how it behaves.
As I mentioned earlier; "together we are stronger" ... and faster ... and more efficient ...

Comment