If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I see that in the circuit that you give the + and - are reverced!!
Is this because I am begginer,and cant read between the lines?Or there is mistake?
Thanks
I see that in the circuit that you give the + and - are reverced!!
Is this because I am begginer,and cant read between the lines?Or there is mistake?
Thanks
p.s.can I use 50-0-50 ma meter for this scematic?
Hi Geto,
Some people will draw an opamp with the - (inverting) terminal at the top and the + (noniverting) terminal at the bottom. Others like it the other way around. You just need to be careful when you build the design, and note the correct connections. This can often lead to mistakes, especially when the two are mixed together in the same schematic, which is not good practice.
In other words, just make certain that you connect the inverting terminal to pin 2 and the noninverting to pin3. Essentially it makes no difference which method you use.
It looks like this detector requires a 50-0-50 uA meter, but Sasho should be able to confirm this.
Hello Geto
One of the main features of 2N4393 FET is low cut-off voltage. I have read other people suggest that a European equivalent is a BF245c, although from looking at the spec sheet, I can't see why BF245A is not a better choice from that group. Maybe somebody can clarify that.
TIS75 should also work. I think also J113 should be OK, but it has exactly reversed pinout. Just turn J113 around 180 degrees.
Hmmm, does anybody wanna thwack me for my choice of BF245A (or any of the others)? I could be a bonehead.
porkluvr,
what is your opinion about 2N7000 (2N7002)? I see these used on motherboards.
Kt315:
The 2N7002 is enhancement mode MOSFET. So, I thought it appropriate, and a simple matter to test with pull-up to positive rail instead of pull-up to ground.
I hooked up LTspice to test the idea. I did not "wire" the exact same circuit, just a quick and dirty test with a 200mvP-P 50kHz sine wave getting switched through; something for easy to eyeball results. Tested side-by side with TIS75 and 2N4393 (remember these are only models, and not the real thing).
I was disapppointed. I tried several different pull-up biasing schemes; different voltages (including ground), and different pull-up resistor, but the 2N4393 and TIS75 performed (their circuits remained unchanged) while the 2N7002 did not perform well at all, no matter what I tried. Of course, I did not try everything, and maybe I'll try again later, but enough is enough. I know when I've been beaten. We have something that works, so there is no need to fit a square peg into round hole (not today)!
Dang it, I've got a bucket load of these in the SOT23 package that I hope are good for something besides driving LEDs and buzzers. If I come up with a better use for them I'll let you know!
Consider that 2N7002 is more of a power device, whereas 2N4393 is for small signal. I can't explain any better than that, it's all I know.
Last edited by porkluvr; 06-14-2007, 03:25 AM.
Reason: wordsruntogether
Comment