Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gradiometer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Esteban View Post
    Why don't remove flux ?
    It looks very bad resoldering work.

    Orrible... more than UGLY BETTY.

    (well... ugly in the show, with all the added stuff... but looking the pictures below... not so ugly - apart the last one )


    Sorry Max, you're very confussed, because I don't dissambled it. So, if you can remove the flux at YOUR STYLE , do it. But, first remove the flux of your brain with Haloperidol...

    "Orrible" way for to write "horrible", also...
    Maybe you haven't "dissambled"... horrible way of write "disassembled"... anyway... you made this.... don't you ???

    If you can do this why don't couldn't you do that !???

    You have the required skills ! YOU CAN !

    Kind regards,
    Max
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #17
      And what with an old Zahori I built in 1988, near 20 years... Maybe I work better now, but I can't see your TGS coils, for example, maybe these are "orrible" too.

      But you can't opinate with property since you use "orrible" quantities of solvents, acids, thinner, gasoline, aceton, alcohol, etc., for to clean a simple PCB. Your method is the most "orrible" I hear in my life!

      Regards, mister

      Esteban

      PS: Do you see the "orrible" red tantalum cap?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Esteban View Post
        And what with an old Zahori I built in 1988, near 20 years... Maybe I work better now, but I can't see your TGS coils, for example, maybe these are "orrible" too.

        But you can't opinate with property since you use "orrible" quantities of solvents, acids, thinner, gasoline, aceton, alcohol, etc., for to clean a simple PCB. Your method is the most "orrible" I hear in my life!

        Regards, mister

        Esteban

        PS: Do you see the "orrible" red tantalum cap?
        Hi,
        you forget Clint Eastwood's cigars... mandatory when using solvents!

        now are 20years ??? You said 10 years in zahori-thread !

        Oh yes... there is the "more": more for you mean another 10years!

        You measure time by counting your LRLs ?

        Man you need medicine for your memory !

        I could order for you ! I'm the CURE!

        Kind regards,
        Max
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by kt315 View Post
          Why don't remove flux ?
          It looks very bad resoldering work.

          Max, seems like fliux is not the flux. it is a varnish. traditionally PCB's in USSR were nice varnished, frequently even by two coats. you maybe in course that GOST acceptance was been accurately effective on these things. the varnish is of such quality that you can not able simply to dissolve it (by good dissolvent). it may be deleted only by soldering heat...
          it was ordinary mattery in soviet industry... now... you see yourself - asiatics absoliutely ignore any standarts in the world ... and you certainly think IT IS SUCH THING I SEE ANYWHERE HERE AND THERE, but you are not right...
          the PCB has the good 'soviet' standart quality.
          Actually it's probably PCB lacquer, like this -> http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?...aquer&doy=11m9

          Comment


          • #20
            now are 20years ??? You said 10 years in zahori-thread !

            Max, in the thread said "10 years or more". OK, but isn't important. The publication is of 1987, and first I built like the magazine and later make modifications, so is very correct 1988, near 20 years, exactly 19 years.

            I'm the CURE!

            Medice, cura te ipsum!

            Also, this is not a thread for to discuss this.

            Regards

            Esteban

            Comment


            • #21
              Protocol of gradiometer

              Originally posted by Esteban View Post
              now are 20years ??? You said 10 years in zahori-thread !

              Max, in the thread said "10 years or more". OK, but isn't important. The publication is of 1987, and first I built like the magazine and later make modifications, so is very correct 1988, near 20 years, exactly 19 years.

              I'm the CURE!

              Medice, cura te ipsum!

              Also, this is not a thread for to discuss this.

              Regards

              Esteban
              Hi to all
              Do anyone have a Protocol of gradiometer ? (What is the protocol data is sent to the software?)

              Comment

              Working...
              X