Well Ivconic, I see it a little different,
The big multi-national companies need to protect the units they produce from any market competition, along with vertical integration, they will gain maximized profits for a while.
What better way then to keep details of their unit secret, and to make it illegal to use that knowledge by any one. If there were no non disclosure agreements, or copyright or intellectual laws,
the only way to have profits would be the law of market returns or who can sell the best unit for the lowest price.
This would create a growth in knowledge, competition, and product quality (more bang for the buck). Lets use MD's for an example if Whites, Fisher, and Minelab all had an equal knowledge base,
and there were no product protection laws the winner in the market place would be the one that could innovate the fastest and produce the best for the price, Real competition.
But instead of true competition in the market, we now have a corporate focus on law suits, inflating the stock price through stock buy backs, laying off and firing the workers so that the price to earning numbers look good,
while sales, and investment in research and development, fall.
Product innovation is weak at best, and a new color light, or sound added passes for new. Cannibalization of past R&D is now just a substitute for cutting edge.
Why worry, none of the knowledge owned can be used by any one, but the Chinese. Knowledge should not be the sole property of any group, keeping the people ignorant is what was done to the slaves, if any slave learned to read they would be shot, and possibly the owner too.
But I'm an Idealist, and the multi-nationals own the world, and the laws it operates under.
The big multi-national companies need to protect the units they produce from any market competition, along with vertical integration, they will gain maximized profits for a while.
What better way then to keep details of their unit secret, and to make it illegal to use that knowledge by any one. If there were no non disclosure agreements, or copyright or intellectual laws,
the only way to have profits would be the law of market returns or who can sell the best unit for the lowest price.
This would create a growth in knowledge, competition, and product quality (more bang for the buck). Lets use MD's for an example if Whites, Fisher, and Minelab all had an equal knowledge base,
and there were no product protection laws the winner in the market place would be the one that could innovate the fastest and produce the best for the price, Real competition.
But instead of true competition in the market, we now have a corporate focus on law suits, inflating the stock price through stock buy backs, laying off and firing the workers so that the price to earning numbers look good,
while sales, and investment in research and development, fall.
Product innovation is weak at best, and a new color light, or sound added passes for new. Cannibalization of past R&D is now just a substitute for cutting edge.
Why worry, none of the knowledge owned can be used by any one, but the Chinese. Knowledge should not be the sole property of any group, keeping the people ignorant is what was done to the slaves, if any slave learned to read they would be shot, and possibly the owner too.
But I'm an Idealist, and the multi-nationals own the world, and the laws it operates under.
Comment