Try this?
Maxbiri, I wish I had thought to ask you what frequency you have set.
I have the freq.pot set at 50% and have tweaked parallel (parasitic) properties of the 10mH coil so that I have a good peak
using a 4.7nF tank cap. Adjusted drive pot for a -reasonable- combination of amplitude and waveform symmetry.
TX setup is complete (fo=20.4kHz).
Here is how I would set the RX phase:
The russian (?) drawing shows 8.2nF parallel in the receive tank. Give it a try.
Maybe the cap marked 250pF is actually supposed to be 25pf? I try that.
According to your schematic, you have placed 100k resistor across the GCX pot. Remove it, or put it from the BOTTOM terminal to the wiper.
That makes a big difference. 100K gives 35 degrees of adjustment. 300k increases the range to about 48 degrees.
A whopping 55 degrees of GCX adjustment results from removing the 100k altogether.
Probably better to use 10k resistor instead of 100k on the LM393 input(s).
Now, take a look!!! One of the coil's leads may need to be reversed - one day maybe I understand why. Not today.
***********************************
The red trace is the RX output. Purple (it looks brown) is GCX ZCD output, knob turned CCW. Orange is GCX ZCD, knob turned CW.
(I hope CW and CCW are not reversed. I find this all very confusing.)
I think this is pretty close to what is supposed to happen, except that I would delay rx signal maybe 3 more degrees?? Changing the 25pF to 33pF
would take care of that. Maybe it's not necessary, but would assure that received signal of neutral soil is within range of GCX CW adjustment?
Putting a 250pf capacitor across the 48k7 resistor shifts the rx signal about 45 degrees to the right. I think that would ruin your GCX channel's response.
I thought I had this thing figured out before? Um,hmmm. That shows how easily I can fool myself. If this setup is wrong, I hope
somebody will explain why. I have no scope to check this stuff in real world.
I might have the CW to-the-left and CCW to-the-right movement mixed up, I dunno.
Heck, this whole thing might be wrong, but it looks good from where I see it.
Maxbiri, I wish I had thought to ask you what frequency you have set.
I have the freq.pot set at 50% and have tweaked parallel (parasitic) properties of the 10mH coil so that I have a good peak
using a 4.7nF tank cap. Adjusted drive pot for a -reasonable- combination of amplitude and waveform symmetry.
TX setup is complete (fo=20.4kHz).
Here is how I would set the RX phase:
The russian (?) drawing shows 8.2nF parallel in the receive tank. Give it a try.
Maybe the cap marked 250pF is actually supposed to be 25pf? I try that.
According to your schematic, you have placed 100k resistor across the GCX pot. Remove it, or put it from the BOTTOM terminal to the wiper.
That makes a big difference. 100K gives 35 degrees of adjustment. 300k increases the range to about 48 degrees.
A whopping 55 degrees of GCX adjustment results from removing the 100k altogether.
Probably better to use 10k resistor instead of 100k on the LM393 input(s).
Now, take a look!!! One of the coil's leads may need to be reversed - one day maybe I understand why. Not today.
***********************************
The red trace is the RX output. Purple (it looks brown) is GCX ZCD output, knob turned CCW. Orange is GCX ZCD, knob turned CW.
(I hope CW and CCW are not reversed. I find this all very confusing.)
I think this is pretty close to what is supposed to happen, except that I would delay rx signal maybe 3 more degrees?? Changing the 25pF to 33pF
would take care of that. Maybe it's not necessary, but would assure that received signal of neutral soil is within range of GCX CW adjustment?
Putting a 250pf capacitor across the 48k7 resistor shifts the rx signal about 45 degrees to the right. I think that would ruin your GCX channel's response.
I thought I had this thing figured out before? Um,hmmm. That shows how easily I can fool myself. If this setup is wrong, I hope
somebody will explain why. I have no scope to check this stuff in real world.
I might have the CW to-the-left and CCW to-the-right movement mixed up, I dunno.
Heck, this whole thing might be wrong, but it looks good from where I see it.
Comment