Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Superscan PI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by nelson View Post
    Hi aft_72005.
    Does your 40 cm coil for delta pulse work stable, cause 1 to 1.2 ohms of resistance must get IRF740 to hot?
    How do you fix this?
    Thnkas
    Regards
    Nelson

    Hi Nelson
    Yes , working stable . no, IRF didn’t hot.
    Best regards.

    Comment


    • #32
      SuperScan

      Dear Rospy
      Can u Upload Full Schematic,PCB and Part list for SuperScan pls?
      It will be very well for all on this forum
      Thnak a lot and have good time

      Comment


      • #33
        Hi friends. What is the number of diodes used in these devices. Good work everyone.

        Best Regards

        Comment


        • #34
          Hi friends why not help anyone. PBC should have prepared me that this device has been drawn.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by rospy View Post
            The circuits



            The Detector

            that a modified XL-500 .What do you think.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by strujas View Post
              Does enyone have a single side pcb for superscan ?
              Strujas, the pcb of Superscan traced by Rospy is single sided. Note that Rospy shows in the above circuits a lot of useless RF chokes. This is not true, the circuit contains no chokes. In reality these components are resistors with zero resistance, ie 0R0. They are used instead wire connections because pcb is single sided.
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #37
                I do not know my teacher to draw diagrams, so I need a printable version. This device is very important for me to do. diode in the diagram also does not write numbers. Please be in the hands of a friend of mine sent me this device is ready to get drawn into. [email protected]

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by mollax View Post
                  that a modified XL-500 .What do you think.
                  does anybody due know Superscan was being projected by Eric Foster? I do not see any advantage of Superscan schematic over Delta Pulse. DP is more advanced in S.A.T. control part, for example.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Dear KT315 ,
                    You know me , I build delta with your helps ,
                    I saw and used original superscan ,
                    while delta can not detect metal cigarette lighter at 50cm , superscan can detact it at almost two meters.
                    it has 2 big size 12V batteries , IC were almost same as delta ,
                    uses really big heat sink ,it's coil was almost 80cm circular,but really heavy, I could not hold it with holder even for a minute.
                    I you can arrange this circuit , please send me pcb.I would like to build it first.
                    kind regards
                    Okantex

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Dear kt315
                      superscan with delta pulse as the difference between shooting better than 50% superscan. Our observations that such a huge difference. The course would be to think otherwise. and for some reason this forum does not interest enough in this device. obviously very sad for us. I insisted I wanted to work on this machine. PBC layout drawn somewhere I have not found it necessary to file could not start. and none of my friends did not want to help. will still be sent to my friends who would like to inform'd be very grateful. [email protected]

                      Best Regards

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hello Forum,
                        Before to have PCB , let draw a decent schematic because many notations
                        it is not understanding because not English...and many connections you did not know where they goes.....
                        i did propose to draw slowly a good schematic together....
                        and after it will be more more easy to draw the pcb !!!
                        have a nice day,
                        Alexis.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          thanks, but I do not see in this schematic nothing productive. still one PI schematic. without discrimination. why you do not wish to buy Hammerhead PCB for only $10 and to do good PI that will such as Superscan? Delta Pulse is full real non-motion detector with very fine long SAT. Hammerhead is very fine nice compilation of your very popular Garrett XL500, Surf PI etc all PI detectors. Carl Moreland did huge work described HH so you have the best in the world description and manual. you even do not need my suggestions, Eric Foster, Chemelec, or anyone doing Hammerhead. nothing fantastic and fresh new in Superscan I do not see of.

                          regards

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            That drawing is a bad joke. I want to hear about what happens when somebody puts +24VDC into one end of an LM555 device and -12VDC on the other end. Same goes for the CD4538, CD4066, and etcetera.

                            "Oh I built the Superscan according to this drawing but it does not work. What could be wrong? Something smells funny when I turn it on."

                            Bwaaa haaa haaa.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by porkluvr View Post
                              That drawing is a bad joke. I want to hear about what happens when somebody puts +24VDC into one end of an LM555 device and -12VDC on the other end. Same goes for the CD4538, CD4066, and etcetera.

                              "Oh I built the Superscan according to this drawing but it does not work. What could be wrong? Something smells funny when I turn it on."

                              Bwaaa haaa haaa.
                              Porkluvr, Supply schematic is designed correct.
                              The circuit is powered by three regulated rails: minus 12V, minus 5V and +5V. Incorrect and misleading is only the designation of battery terminals. The plus battery terminal instead +24V should be noted as GND, COM or zero. The minus battery terminal should be noted as -24V or more correct as -Bat.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by mikebg View Post
                                Porkluvr, Supply schematic is designed correct.
                                The circuit is powered by three regulated rails: minus 12V, minus 5V and +5V. Incorrect and misleading is only the designation of battery terminals. The plus battery terminal instead +24V should be noted as GND, COM or zero. The minus battery terminal should be noted as -24V or more correct as -Bat.
                                Well. That's just plain crazy, but I know you're right.

                                It appears that according to arithmetic of the schematic artist, 12V + |-12V| = 12V, or something like that. That's about as clear as mud, but I can live with it.

                                It would have made more sense to call the supply rails something like Marylou, Dietmar, and Fritz and thereby not defy basic laws of mathematics, but that's just an opinion.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X