Originally posted by detectoman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
tr metal detector
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by detectoman View Postesteban is great in make of all class of detectors, i have photos of detectors he made, he has very years of build everyvary circuit, in special case of fiber glass, the project of esteban are inventional , modifications, expanditions, he give in thunting big amount of material one on everything
Comment
-
Originally posted by Esteban View PostIs a great coincidence that alls that attack me post 0 schematics.
And no one attack you. You are OK, but you have no luck in religious question. You belive in LRLs (support Mineoro black busines too) and some others do not believe in LRLs (and does not support Mineoro business). Essentially, only technical question, nothing personal. But if you questions of working - non working devices take personal it is your decision.
Comment
-
Hi friends.
pardon me, I couldn't abide not to put a post for this:
Originally posted by WM6 View PostDon't ask esteban, he has never made working detector in his life.
the more they get the less give and think with provoking can get more.
this is a blamable habit.
Esteban is a very knowledgeable and professional expert man in this field who has taught a lot to eagers like me and humbly led us for what we asked him.
when somebody ask from a mastermind in this field, our mind recall unconsciously Esteban Cabrera from Paraguay.
some whiles whilst work in field we call his name and works in my THing team.
me personally have learnt many things from him and am thankful of him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mesy64 View Posttank you esteban.
coils have core????
Tr. and rec. has cores, receiver 2, so in this schematic you have 3 cores. In the paper you found the characteristics of these cores, but this can be difficult to find the same. But seems common ferrite cores are used, better if these cores contain the ferrite screw for fine tuning.Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by michael View PostHi friends.
pardon me, I couldn't abide not to put a post for this:
As if people who spare others of their info are much more claimer or boaster.
the more they get the less give and think with provoking can get more.
this is a blamable habit.
Esteban is a very knowledgeable and professional expert man in this field who has taught a lot to eagers like me and humbly led us for what we asked him.
when somebody ask from a mastermind in this field, our mind recall unconsciously Esteban Cabrera from Paraguay.
some whiles whilst work in field we call his name and works in my THing team.
me personally have learnt many things from him and am thankful of him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Esteban View Post
I don't discuss uselessly never again with some people. Wasting time...
Taking this into account I will never understand why a smart guy like you, are willing to spends life-time with the illusory LRL devices?
I am not against your own joy, but I will always defend the right of those affected by LRL on the second opinions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WM6 View PostMichael, you are LRL believers. I am sorry that your religion is attacked by my words. Not intentionally. But you know, victimisation is convenient way to replace poor arguments. I can only say that victimisation not convincing me. Never.
one of these working LRLs is the PD that Alonso has made and Morgan presented humbly all its’ info to us, I'm 100% sure it works and is very useful for very quick monitoring and area to find hot locations for consequent pinpointing by an pinpointer.
As I have told this before few times, the treasure locations found by our powerful PI are detectable by PD too.
possibly if I was very experienced with PD, would even do accurate pinpointing with PD as well.
And we know Esteban formulas or knowledge is very close to his cousin; Dr. Alonso (maybe more) so why his contraptions shouldn't work?
According to what PD copiers here(including me) experienced, can conclude Esteban contraptions work at least like his cousin devices.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Esteban....I'm a simple guy not very able in theories and formulas, but I can help in some things due my experience building all kind of MD....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Esteban View PostHi
Tr. and rec. has cores, receiver 2, so in this schematic you have 3 cores. In the paper you found the characteristics of these cores, but this can be difficult to find the same. But seems common ferrite cores are used, better if these cores contain the ferrite screw for fine tuning.
Hi Esteban.
Coils L1 and L2 from the receiver are very accountable for the good work of this detector. Also if mesy64 will not use the P18/11 type, maybe to have self-oscillations!!!!!
This schematic is at big degree a "clone" of GeminiII, so the performance is near it. I constructed it before years..... and i was not so glad.
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geo View PostHi Esteban.
Coils L1 and L2 from the receiver are very accountable for the good work of this detector. Also if mesy64 will not use the P18/11 type, maybe to have self-oscillations!!!!!
This schematic is at big degree a "clone" of GeminiII, so the performance is near it. I constructed it before years..... and i was not so glad.
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by Esteban View PostIf you adjust very well the tune in receiver and also increases the power in transmitter you can achieve very good performance..... no more depth
!!!!
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geo View PostYes but at all 2Box there is a limit.... After you will make perfect coil alignment, you can give so much Tx power or Rx gain until you hear the signal (beep). After it..... No more power.... no more depth
!!!!
Regards
Comment
Comment