LOOKING FOR GOLDSCAN 4 Schematic.

[pito]

I think the voltage at the end of the swing is maximum it is mainly caused by the change of direction of movement, the coil sees the earth's magnetic field +65 μT then - 65 μT ...
Now I see that U2 is just preparing the signal for processing and changes from coin will be visible at the output of U4

[Carl-NC]

I think I understood what you wrote.
Yes, the R27...someone suggested earlier, and I agree, that it's better to put a 1K there.
And if I put anti-parallel diodes, then the value of R27 could be slightly lower.
Your opinion? And the difference in two diodes in the same direction and two antiparallel ones?
Is it related to the fact that the "ground" is at a potential of 14.4v?

My preference is to always use antiparallel diodes. One to clamp the flyback and the other to clamp the -14V. You can lower R27 to improve thermal noise but often I leave it a high value (even several kΩ) as I find that EMI is usually higher than thermal noise. A higher value for R27 also makes the diode clamp much faster which lets you sample earlier. It's one of those things to play with.

[Altra]

I think the voltage at the end of the swing is maximum it is mainly caused by the change of direction of movement, the coil sees the earth's magnetic field +65 μT then - 65 μT ...
Now I see that U2 is just preparing the signal for processing and changes from coin will be visible at the output of U4

Place a 1K trim pot between pins 14 and 15 on the 4053 with the wiper going to the junction of C6 and R32. Use a magnet to adjust the ef null.

[ivconic]

For more serious experiments; first it is necessary to transfer the schematic to editable form.
I respected the numbering of the components as in Alex's schematic so that there would be no confusion.
Like always Schematic is done in : https://www.expresspcb.com/
Bellow is packed editable schematic file...

[pito]

I want to practice on simple one as barracuda, then on more complex. Waiting for P MOSFET.

[ivconic]

Of course, that's a good way. I did the first PI in 1992. It was a kit from the Austrian Conrad catalog.
Times were much better for the hobby back then.
There were not many detectors and detectorists and the sites were untouched.
I've had a lot of great finds with that simple PI!
But I dug for all the signals.
The coil was 20cm, so it was not very deep.
Come to think of it... even today if I were to dig for all the signals; I would probably have more good finds!
And that's the background of this idea around the GS4.
That PI from the 90's was "slow" and didn't see large coins very well let alone smaller ones.
I will try to tweak the GS4 mostly relying on Carl's suggestions and help.
And then I'll dig with it on most signals. It's time to find many good finds again.
And all these other VLF I/B toys have finished their story... at least in my sites.

[pito]

Circuit Modification First Step;
blue line = power modification
red line = can be replaced with stm32f103,
Second step;
green line = final modification

[pito]

The reduced range is due to mixing two channels. = instead of mixing we can calculate the magnitude and phase using stm32

[ivconic]

It's obvious you're new to this stuff...
You repeated some mistakes on your Barracuda rewrite too.
But for your sake, for your true learning and advancement; it is best not to tell you anything; but you to see for yourself in your work what will work for you and what will not.
You were in a hurry, you didn't want to listen.
The basic advice and the only one I will give you; FIRST DO the detector in basic form, as someone has already done it and it worked well for him.
And only then, when it works well for you too, and you become familiar with all aspects of work;
only then can you give yourself the freedom to "butcher" and "tailor" the project as you think would be good.
Otherwise, if you immediately start building, for example, a Barracuda according to the "butchered" schematic that you published earlier; it won't work for you at all.
Feel free to take my word for it.
And don't misunderstand these tips of mine. I have been making detectors since the early 90's. And as you can see; I made the GS4 in its original form first of all.
In order to get to know all aspects of the operation of that detector live.
And only when I do it all the way; I will start with tweaks, but not all at once but one by one, after each tweak there will be a period of testing and detailed checks.
I planned not to write you this.
But I can see even now that you will have a lot of problems and that it will not work for you.
It is better to listen to the advice of an elder.

[pito]

I have good results on IB VLF, just out of curiosity, I'm thinking about trying PI.
I hesitate to do so because the PI detectors I've seen, for coins have a 50% shorter range.

[ivconic]

@Carl,
R8 = 47k, 10k instead will allow adjustments up to 1000pps...
This is the first "tweak" to do and see the changes in behavior... if any.
This will be the "second phase" of the job where things will go very slowly...
To avoid white smoke!

[ivconic]

Ok, 10k gives me 890-1300 Hz !!! Wow!
Behavior of the detector hasn't significantly changed... except this; with loud audio detection overall power consumption now is .... 150mA !?????? WTF???
Carl you gonna love this; yes you are right, all 5 pulses can be scoped at the same time!
Here is the Delay behavior and timings:

[ivconic]

Approximate timings:

[ivconic]

One thing confuses me, however.
Last time the pulses on the gates were 4Vpp while on Q4 it was around 3Vpp and now that has changed and now the pulse on Q4 is around 5Vpp and on the gates it is 1v ???
Last time I monitored 3 pulses simultaneously and now all 5.
Last time it worked at 500PPS and now it works at 1000PPS.
What of all this is the reason for this change???

[ivconic]

@ Carl,
My BAD!
Shameful!
I completely forgot to check RV2 and it was not completely closed, that's why shortest possible delay in previous case was "≥ 30uS".... WRONG!
Now when I turned RV2 to 0 resistance; situation has changed, actual shortest possible delay on original GS4 setup is "≥ 10uS" and that's now correct!
...
Also noticed one more thing, previous confusion about peaks of pulses... scoping only Q4 gives amplitude slightly over 8Vpp.
Adding second pulse (via 10k) is decreasing it to 6Vpp and so on. Q4 with all 4 other gives as on above photo 5Vpp.
And that part now is clarified. But Q8,Q7,Q6 and and Q5 still remains at ~1Vpp ???
I changed PPS down to 380Hz and nothing has changed, still all 4 are ~1Vpp. Misty??
...
Anyhow, now with shortest possible delay, 1000PPS, GND mode, smallest coin is detected much better, clearer! Bingo!
And there is another "intrigue" to solve, Carl you try to explain this; 1000PPS....all as you see on posted photos and yet overall power consumption with loudest detection is rock solid 150mA ???
How come?
This is "battery saver" solution! What if... 2000PPS... and more?
...
Probably as I adjust wider pulses the consumption will rise a bit...
...
Fun! Fun! Fun!