Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golden Mask Schematic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    hey great

    the ic´s are not sanded i hope that our specialists here can now start to to draw their traces

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by bernte_one View Post
      hey great

      the ic´s are not sanded i hope that our specialists here can now start to to draw their traces

      Getting Closer , but the last picture is still very poor !! Only 1 ic is clear . My next guess : The circuit is a mix of Bandido/Troy ? It will be a Great Project for this Winter Thanks Everyone .

      Best Regards............Eugene

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by amtech2005 View Post
        Getting Closer , but the last picture is still very poor !! Only 1 ic is clear . My next guess : The circuit is a mix of Bandido/Troy ? It will be a Great Project for this Winter Thanks Everyone .

        Best Regards............Eugene
        I don't see Bandido nor Troy (especially not Troy!) similarities but more to Magnum/Wave.
        Maybe he meant "Bandito" not "Bandido" ?
        Because "Bandito" was also some older Bulgarian effort.

        Comment


        • #19
          Photos are still unusable to make even closer guess, nor tracing.
          Yet, roughly, we can see RX with transistor front end and TX with bunch transistors too.
          That's why i assume it must have something to do with Magnum/Wave...

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ivconic View Post
            Photos are still unusable to make even closer guess, nor tracing.
            Yet, roughly, we can see RX with transistor front end and TX with bunch transistors too.
            That's why i assume it must have something to do with Magnum/Wave...

            The Bulgarians need to stop calling it Bandido Golden Mask on their forums . I remember they were selling complete Magnum circuit boards a few years back on a .BG site and then maybe they were modified slightly to what we see today .

            The 8 khz is odd , but maybe has better canceling to rusty nails . I need to study more before I get excited and post ideas too fast !! I only see one 14 pin [st microelectronics] ic labeled Ez DU809 ? We need better pictures.

            HH.............Eugene

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by amtech2005 View Post
              The Bulgarians need to stop calling it Bandido Golden Mask on their forums . I remember they were selling complete Magnum circuit boards a few years back on a .BG site and then maybe they were modified slightly to what we see today .

              The 8 khz is odd , but maybe has better canceling to rusty nails . I need to study more before I get excited and post ideas too fast !! I only see one 14 pin [st microelectronics] ic labeled Ez DU809 ? We need better pictures.

              HH.............Eugene
              It is TL074 and follows after RX front end. As expected.
              So up to that stage (including it) it is close to Wave.

              Comment


              • #22
                ...
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #23
                  Despite shaved IC labels it would be really piece of cake to make reverse ee on it.
                  I really don't understand why those people do rasp IC labels on such simple designs?
                  If it was a bit more serious or complex design, with some specific ic's - than it would make a sense to scrape labels and confuse the others... but on such simple design is really trivial to do that.
                  To stop who?
                  This can stop from copying, only, complete beginners and nobody else.
                  Generally, for unknown opamps, dual or quad, IC sockets are installed and few models are checked.
                  So sooner or later proper opamp will take the place. Opamp is opamp. We do know very well what kind of opamp is suitable on given place in design.
                  So it is really trivial to sand labels from opamps.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Ivconic Look Here !!!

                    Mr. Ivconic !!!! Look what I found , do you remember this machine from 1992 that disappeared , Eureka Ace for Europe a dual , 8 and 19 khz with difficult soil toggle mode !!!!
                    Is it coincidence or am I dreaming again about circuit similarities !! Not too much posted now , but See Attachments :

                    Have a Great Day Everyone !!

                    Best Regerds..............Eugene
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I haven't such luck to see Eureka so far, nor to test it or work with it.
                      Each detector is somehow similar to another one.
                      Yet, i think Eureka is to much complex to be compared with something much simpler like GM.
                      Eureka is having uPC and huge pile of various IC's.
                      I don't think GM is anyhow related to any Minelab model.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by ivconic View Post
                        I haven't such luck to see Eureka so far, nor to test it or work with it.
                        Each detector is somehow similar to another one.
                        Yet, i think Eureka is to much complex to be compared with something much simpler like GM.
                        Eureka is having uPC and huge pile of various IC's.
                        I don't think GM is anyhow related to any Minelab model.

                        Ivconic , where can I find information on the Magnum/Wave you talked about ? Thank-You


                        HH.................Eugene

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hi amtech2005. Look at this http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...t=16524&page=3

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by maikl View Post
                            Thank-You Maikl !! I see a lot of information on just those 3 pages .

                            HH.............Eugene

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17215
                              Bandito 2 schematic = Golde mask 2 but whith little change

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by N@SKO View Post
                                http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17215
                                Bandito 2 schematic = Golde mask 2 but whith little change
                                I dont know whos if any the gold mask is based off but what I do know is there was tweeks done on them for the UK market and ive not read a bad write up, Garry describes the gold mask range similar to the tesro silver saber but with alot more punch, he was pulling out bits of hamered silver 7" plus getting constant 2 way signals, Garry does not like detectors with lots of knobs and meters ie DFX, thats why I dont trust his judgement on them, but far as basic get up and go detectors he seems to be accurate with his judgement, like the 1V which in my and his opinion are the same.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X