If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
After seeing Jan's comments and your schematic, I was thinking that we could have a variable pulse width..
What do you think of having the driving coil and the transducer act as a resonant circuit so that muliple pulses are sent. (perhaps you do this already)
Then, if we use Jan's idea and add a thrystor to shut down the tank, but control when it is activated, we can adjust the number of pulses sent out.
If we made the pulse width controllable by the PIC, then someone using the sonar could adjust for maximum sensitivity, or maximum resolution.
Also, what does the op amp to the right of this picture do? Is it used to show the pulse with, number of pulses, etc?
After seeing Jan's comments and your schematic, I was thinking that we could have a variable pulse width..
What do you think of having the driving coil and the transducer act as a resonant circuit so that muliple pulses are sent. (perhaps you do this already)
Then, if we use Jan's idea and add a thrystor to shut down the tank, but control when it is activated, we can adjust the number of pulses sent out.
If we made the pulse width controllable by the PIC, then someone using the sonar could adjust for maximum sensitivity, or maximum resolution.
Also, what does the op amp to the right of this picture do? Is it used to show the pulse with, number of pulses, etc?
For some reason my last message posted twice, and when I came and looked at the schematic again, I realized that The right half is the beginning of the receive circuitry. The diodes clamp the input and prevent overload..
I guess this makes me wonder if we want an underdamped LC circuit on the output, because this will reduce the resolution of the receiver.
Ideally, if we had separate transmit and receive arrays, would we have an inductor connected to the receive array at all? If not, perhaps we should modify Jan's idea to take the coil out of the circuit completely once it has fired...
Comment